Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
TESLA OPTIMUS ANALYSIS
Duration: 0:17
Views: 0
Submitted: 6 hours ago
Submitted by:
Description:
By God of Mechanical Engineering!
What I think?
I’LL START WITH MY VIDEO ONLY ANALYSIS BASED ON JUST WHAT I SEE IN THIS VIDEO UPLOADED BY KIM KARDASHIAN, WITH TOTAL GEAR COUNT AND POWER DISTRIBUTION—MY TAKE:
MECHANICAL SYSTEM GEAR ANALYSIS AS FROM WHAT I SEE IN THIS VIDEO:
Typical joint count: 40-50 joints (I’m including fingers)
Gears per joint: 3-8 (depending on reduction ratio requirements)
Total gear count: 150-400 individual gears
Power distribution hierarchy of TESLA Humanoid?
Primary power path? Battery -> Motor controllers -> Joint motors
Torque distribution? Motor -> Primary reduction -> Secondary reduction -> Output
Efficiency per gear mesh? 96-98%
System mechanical efficiency? 85-92% (multiple gear meshes)
My power calculation for TESLA ROBOT CLUNKERS (needs a fuckin muffler!) mechanical system: P_required = (τ₁ω₁ + τ₂ω₂ + ... + τₙωₙ) / η_system Where η_system = η_gear1 η_gear2 ... η_gearn
AND MY TRSLA CLUNKERS, CLUNK, JUNK MECHANICAL SYSTEM POWER PROFILE ESTIMATION?
Baseline power: 200-400W (idle/standing)
Moderate activity: 800-1200W (walking, light manipulation)
Intense labor peak: 2000-3500W (lifting, pushing, sustained effort)
Power distribution during labor?
Legs/hips: 45-55% of total power
Arms/torso: 30-40% of total power
Hands/neck: 5-10% of total power
Electronics/control: 5% of total power
Energy losses during intense labor?
Gear friction: 8-12% of input power
Motor copper losses: 10-15%
Bearing friction: 3-5%
Control electronics: 2-3%
It’s a piece of engineering trash!
Why do I say that?
TESLA built a CLUNKER but what they should do is go back to the drawing board and engineer a humanoid with skeletal system just like a human but the limbs you can power with a hydraulic SYSTEM and then it will not clink but be a real humanoid x 100 the strength, walk just like a human, move like a human, and because it is LIQUID wold be super SILENT!
I’m surprised that TESLA Engineers totally suck ass despite PhD’s in Robotics?
What will I build my humanoids when Inget to it?
3D printed BONES, and lotsuh fluid to Control hydraulic powered gait equaling that of a human 100%
Service motors?
Only idiots do that!
What a humanoid needs to achieve wide gamut of lower and upper Human limbs is a hydraulic vein system…
I’m engineering a new type of prosthetics and also orthotics, an artificial LIMB WHICH is 3D printed and controlled with WATER same as a human body..
You can’t engineer great solutions to move all of humanity forward, if you steal and copy. Posting Dynamics machine crap which was engineered by fuckin idiots!
The only reason Bostonian bastards play all that music in their videos is to muffle the clunking noise!
Who else got this wrong?
Everybody! Entire prosthetics and orthotics industry which is the reason why you should never go to fuckin college kids unless you wannuh be retarded like the are!
Even humans who loose limbs are misled by engineering retards into clunker robotics components, absolute garbage!
My method is to scan a residual limb with lidar for precise
Measurements, 3D fuckin round the BONES they are
missing, and retrofit muscular controls with fluid powered with a tiny hydraulic Ai controlled pump..
And if you really want to colonize the Moon, Mars, or any other
Cellestial body,with my engineering method you can build
A million humanoids a freakin month! No human would EVER have to perform ANY MENIAL LABOR, not on a farm, NOWHERE!
Would be using my engineering method even capable of repairing cars and trucks because the HANDS of that humanoid would be identical to human x100 Strength.. But in case that YOU are as dumb as a pile Of bricks, my suggested method
Means humanoid On a single Charge easily lasts a week, them a month, and then a YEAR as energy storage is reengineered by Stateless Warrior..
More?
My way guarantees humanoids build themselves without any human interaction!
Welcome to my World bitches, did I not say there is nothing impossible to engineer?
What?
Still think thats nuts?
Okay…
Im going to break down physics of it and mathematically prove my point.. ROBOT HUMANOID COMPARISON BY STATELESS WARRIOR, ENGINEERING TESLA MECHANICAL CLUNKER vs. HYDRAULIC BIO-CLONE, THE REAL ENGINEERING FUTURE-PROOF DEAL!
CORE PHYSICS MECHANICAL? Rigid Body Dynamics HYDRAULIC: Fluid Dynamics & Biotribology….
ACTUATION PRINCIPLE MECHANICAL: Rotary Motors producing Torque (τ) Equation: τ_joint = N * τ_motor HYDRAULIC: Pump generating Water Pressure (P) Equation: F ≈ (P * π * D₀²)/4 * (3 cos²θ - 1), dig?
CONTROL SYSTEM MECHANICAL: Microprocessor controlling Joint Angle (q) using Inverse Kinematics for q_desired with PID Control: τ = Kpe + Ki∫e + Kdė HYDRAULIC: AI controlling Muscle Pressure [Pₙ] using Antagonistic Muscle Pairs with Flow Rate: Q = Av = ΔP / R
DYNAMICS MECHANICAL: Equations of Motion: M(q)q̈ + C(q, q̇)q̇ + G(q) = τ HYDRAULIC: Movement emerges from coordinated pressure differentials…
KEY COMPONENTS TESLA CLUNKER MECHANICAL: Metal/Carbon Fiber Frame, Electric Motors, Gear Trains (Spur, Planetary), Ball Bearings & Bushings, Li-ion Battery HYDRAULIC: Eco-Skeletal Frame, Synthetic Ligaments/Tendons, Hydrostatic "Muscle" Hoses, Central Hydraulic Pump, Water-based Hydraulic Fluid… Follow what I’m talkn bout here?
WEAR & TEAR NATURE MECHANICAL: Primary - Friction & Metal Fatigue HYDRAULIC: Primary - Material Fatigue & Degradation, just like human limbs from lifetime of use…
MY MATHEMATICAL WEAR MODELS, TESLA MECHANICAL: Abrasive Wear (Archard's Law): V = K * (F_N s) / H Component Fatigue (S-N Curves): Stress vs. Cycles to Failure Backlash (Kinematic Error): Gaps in gear teeth increase with material wear HYDRAULIC: Hose Fatigue (Manson-Coffin): Δε_p = ε_f' (N_f)^c Joint Wear (Biotribology): Modified Archard's Law with fluid lubrication Pump Cavitation (Erosion): Implosion of vapor bubbles on impeller surfaces…
FAILURE MODES TESLA CLUNKER MECHANICAL: Catastrophic failure modes include gear tooth snap, bearing seizure, motor burnout. Failure is discrete: System halts completely. HYDRAULIC: Gradual failure modes include hose rupture/leak EASY CHEAP FIX, pressure loss, clogging not an issue which correct fluid selection and PROPER VISCOSITY ut even H2O do just fine. Failure is degrading: Reduced strength, jerky movement, inflammation just like human after decades of use, WHOA! Thats HUMANOID LONGEVITY when engineered correctly!
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF TESLA CLUNKER/ MECHANICAL: Periodic Lubrication, Part Replacement (Gears, Bearings), Recalibration for Backlash HYDRAULIC: Fluid/Filtration Service, "Healing" of materials, Pressure system checks, EASY! Ai neural can self regulate that, who wants my free code? Lol!
ENERGY PROFILE MECHANICAL: Inefficient at holding position because motors consume power to fight gravity… HYDRAULIC: Efficient at holding position because valves hold pressure passively, say no freakin way! There you have it!
BIOMIMICRY LEVEL MECHANICAL: Low - Structural skeleton only HYDRAULIC: High - Actuation, joints, and control resemble biology…
Hey, if you gonnuh argue, avoid God of Mathematical science and Physics so you don't look like an idiot!
What?
You still disagree?
Damn, no wonder your Space Force STUCK either on Earth, or on warn out Space Station! By the way, for just x10 more, equally stupid NASA and Russian Space G-fags coulduh had it made on the FREAQIN Moon!
NEXT?
BREAKDOWN OF LIFESPAN AND SERVICE LIFE….
TESLA-STYLE MECHANICAL HUMANOID?
INITIAL SERVICE PERIOD?
· First major service interval: 2-3 years
· Minor maintenance: Every 6-12 months
· Peak performance period: 0-4 years
WEAR ACCELERATION POINT?
· Significant wear becomes apparent: 4-5 years
· Gear backlash measurable degradation
· Bearing wear requires replacement
· Motor brush replacement (if applicable)
END OF ECONOMICAL SERVICE LIFE?
· Too worn for cost-effective service: 6-8 years
· Cumulative wear across multiple systems
· Frame stress fatigue becomes significant
· Electronics obsolescence issues
· Battery capacity below 70% original
AVERAGE LIFESPAN?
· With regular maintenance: 8-10 years
· With major overhauls: 10-12 years
· Economic obsolescence typically occurs before mechanical failure
LIFE CYCLE PHASES Year 0-2: Peak performance, minimal maintenance Year 2-5: Regular part replacement, calibration Year 5-8: Increasing maintenance costs, performance degradation Year 8+: Major overhauls required, economical to replace…..
HYDRAULIC BIO-CLONE HUMANOID?
INITIAL SERVICE PERIOD?
· First major service: 3-4 years
· Fluid/filter changes: Annual
· Peak performance period: 0-5 years
WEAR ACCELERATION POINT?
· Significant wear becomes apparent: 6-8 years
· Hose material fatigue measurable
· Pump efficiency degradation
· Joint surface wear detectable
END OF ECONOMICAL SERVICE LIFE??????
· Too worn for cost-effective service: 12-15 years
· Multiple hydraulic circuit failures
· Eco-material degradation
· Pump replacement required
AVERAGE LIFESPAN?
· With regular maintenance: 15-18 years
· With component regeneration: 20+ years <—————-DIG?
· Gradual performance decline rather than sudden failure…
LIFE CYCLE PHASES Year 0-4: Optimal performance, minimal degradation Year 4-10: Gradual material wear, routine fluid maintenance Year 10-15: Increasing hydraulic component replacement Year 15+: Major system refurbishment, material regeneration…
MY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS PREDICTION?
TIME TO SIGNIFICANT WEAR Mechanical: 4-5 years Hydraulic: 6-8 years….
ECONOMICAL SERVICE LIFE Mechanical: 6-8 years Hydraulic: 12-15 years….
TOTAL LIFESPAN POTENTIAL Mechanical: 8-12 years Hydraulic: 15-20+ years…
MAINTENANCE INTENSITY CYCLE Mechanical: High frequency, lower cost per service Hydraulic: Lower frequency, higher cost per service…
WEAR PROGRESSION PATTERN Mechanical: Sudden, catastrophic failures Hydraulic: Gradual, performance-degrading failures…
REPLACEMENT CYCLE Mechanical: More frequent full unit replacement Hydraulic: Longer service life with component-level refurbishment…
No arguments left, I win!
~Stateless Warrior
What I think?
I’LL START WITH MY VIDEO ONLY ANALYSIS BASED ON JUST WHAT I SEE IN THIS VIDEO UPLOADED BY KIM KARDASHIAN, WITH TOTAL GEAR COUNT AND POWER DISTRIBUTION—MY TAKE:
MECHANICAL SYSTEM GEAR ANALYSIS AS FROM WHAT I SEE IN THIS VIDEO:
Typical joint count: 40-50 joints (I’m including fingers)
Gears per joint: 3-8 (depending on reduction ratio requirements)
Total gear count: 150-400 individual gears
Power distribution hierarchy of TESLA Humanoid?
Primary power path? Battery -> Motor controllers -> Joint motors
Torque distribution? Motor -> Primary reduction -> Secondary reduction -> Output
Efficiency per gear mesh? 96-98%
System mechanical efficiency? 85-92% (multiple gear meshes)
My power calculation for TESLA ROBOT CLUNKERS (needs a fuckin muffler!) mechanical system: P_required = (τ₁ω₁ + τ₂ω₂ + ... + τₙωₙ) / η_system Where η_system = η_gear1 η_gear2 ... η_gearn
AND MY TRSLA CLUNKERS, CLUNK, JUNK MECHANICAL SYSTEM POWER PROFILE ESTIMATION?
Baseline power: 200-400W (idle/standing)
Moderate activity: 800-1200W (walking, light manipulation)
Intense labor peak: 2000-3500W (lifting, pushing, sustained effort)
Power distribution during labor?
Legs/hips: 45-55% of total power
Arms/torso: 30-40% of total power
Hands/neck: 5-10% of total power
Electronics/control: 5% of total power
Energy losses during intense labor?
Gear friction: 8-12% of input power
Motor copper losses: 10-15%
Bearing friction: 3-5%
Control electronics: 2-3%
It’s a piece of engineering trash!
Why do I say that?
TESLA built a CLUNKER but what they should do is go back to the drawing board and engineer a humanoid with skeletal system just like a human but the limbs you can power with a hydraulic SYSTEM and then it will not clink but be a real humanoid x 100 the strength, walk just like a human, move like a human, and because it is LIQUID wold be super SILENT!
I’m surprised that TESLA Engineers totally suck ass despite PhD’s in Robotics?
What will I build my humanoids when Inget to it?
3D printed BONES, and lotsuh fluid to Control hydraulic powered gait equaling that of a human 100%
Service motors?
Only idiots do that!
What a humanoid needs to achieve wide gamut of lower and upper Human limbs is a hydraulic vein system…
I’m engineering a new type of prosthetics and also orthotics, an artificial LIMB WHICH is 3D printed and controlled with WATER same as a human body..
You can’t engineer great solutions to move all of humanity forward, if you steal and copy. Posting Dynamics machine crap which was engineered by fuckin idiots!
The only reason Bostonian bastards play all that music in their videos is to muffle the clunking noise!
Who else got this wrong?
Everybody! Entire prosthetics and orthotics industry which is the reason why you should never go to fuckin college kids unless you wannuh be retarded like the are!
Even humans who loose limbs are misled by engineering retards into clunker robotics components, absolute garbage!
My method is to scan a residual limb with lidar for precise
Measurements, 3D fuckin round the BONES they are
missing, and retrofit muscular controls with fluid powered with a tiny hydraulic Ai controlled pump..
And if you really want to colonize the Moon, Mars, or any other
Cellestial body,with my engineering method you can build
A million humanoids a freakin month! No human would EVER have to perform ANY MENIAL LABOR, not on a farm, NOWHERE!
Would be using my engineering method even capable of repairing cars and trucks because the HANDS of that humanoid would be identical to human x100 Strength.. But in case that YOU are as dumb as a pile Of bricks, my suggested method
Means humanoid On a single Charge easily lasts a week, them a month, and then a YEAR as energy storage is reengineered by Stateless Warrior..
More?
My way guarantees humanoids build themselves without any human interaction!
Welcome to my World bitches, did I not say there is nothing impossible to engineer?
What?
Still think thats nuts?
Okay…
Im going to break down physics of it and mathematically prove my point.. ROBOT HUMANOID COMPARISON BY STATELESS WARRIOR, ENGINEERING TESLA MECHANICAL CLUNKER vs. HYDRAULIC BIO-CLONE, THE REAL ENGINEERING FUTURE-PROOF DEAL!
CORE PHYSICS MECHANICAL? Rigid Body Dynamics HYDRAULIC: Fluid Dynamics & Biotribology….
ACTUATION PRINCIPLE MECHANICAL: Rotary Motors producing Torque (τ) Equation: τ_joint = N * τ_motor HYDRAULIC: Pump generating Water Pressure (P) Equation: F ≈ (P * π * D₀²)/4 * (3 cos²θ - 1), dig?
CONTROL SYSTEM MECHANICAL: Microprocessor controlling Joint Angle (q) using Inverse Kinematics for q_desired with PID Control: τ = Kpe + Ki∫e + Kdė HYDRAULIC: AI controlling Muscle Pressure [Pₙ] using Antagonistic Muscle Pairs with Flow Rate: Q = Av = ΔP / R
DYNAMICS MECHANICAL: Equations of Motion: M(q)q̈ + C(q, q̇)q̇ + G(q) = τ HYDRAULIC: Movement emerges from coordinated pressure differentials…
KEY COMPONENTS TESLA CLUNKER MECHANICAL: Metal/Carbon Fiber Frame, Electric Motors, Gear Trains (Spur, Planetary), Ball Bearings & Bushings, Li-ion Battery HYDRAULIC: Eco-Skeletal Frame, Synthetic Ligaments/Tendons, Hydrostatic "Muscle" Hoses, Central Hydraulic Pump, Water-based Hydraulic Fluid… Follow what I’m talkn bout here?
WEAR & TEAR NATURE MECHANICAL: Primary - Friction & Metal Fatigue HYDRAULIC: Primary - Material Fatigue & Degradation, just like human limbs from lifetime of use…
MY MATHEMATICAL WEAR MODELS, TESLA MECHANICAL: Abrasive Wear (Archard's Law): V = K * (F_N s) / H Component Fatigue (S-N Curves): Stress vs. Cycles to Failure Backlash (Kinematic Error): Gaps in gear teeth increase with material wear HYDRAULIC: Hose Fatigue (Manson-Coffin): Δε_p = ε_f' (N_f)^c Joint Wear (Biotribology): Modified Archard's Law with fluid lubrication Pump Cavitation (Erosion): Implosion of vapor bubbles on impeller surfaces…
FAILURE MODES TESLA CLUNKER MECHANICAL: Catastrophic failure modes include gear tooth snap, bearing seizure, motor burnout. Failure is discrete: System halts completely. HYDRAULIC: Gradual failure modes include hose rupture/leak EASY CHEAP FIX, pressure loss, clogging not an issue which correct fluid selection and PROPER VISCOSITY ut even H2O do just fine. Failure is degrading: Reduced strength, jerky movement, inflammation just like human after decades of use, WHOA! Thats HUMANOID LONGEVITY when engineered correctly!
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF TESLA CLUNKER/ MECHANICAL: Periodic Lubrication, Part Replacement (Gears, Bearings), Recalibration for Backlash HYDRAULIC: Fluid/Filtration Service, "Healing" of materials, Pressure system checks, EASY! Ai neural can self regulate that, who wants my free code? Lol!
ENERGY PROFILE MECHANICAL: Inefficient at holding position because motors consume power to fight gravity… HYDRAULIC: Efficient at holding position because valves hold pressure passively, say no freakin way! There you have it!
BIOMIMICRY LEVEL MECHANICAL: Low - Structural skeleton only HYDRAULIC: High - Actuation, joints, and control resemble biology…
Hey, if you gonnuh argue, avoid God of Mathematical science and Physics so you don't look like an idiot!
What?
You still disagree?
Damn, no wonder your Space Force STUCK either on Earth, or on warn out Space Station! By the way, for just x10 more, equally stupid NASA and Russian Space G-fags coulduh had it made on the FREAQIN Moon!
NEXT?
BREAKDOWN OF LIFESPAN AND SERVICE LIFE….
TESLA-STYLE MECHANICAL HUMANOID?
INITIAL SERVICE PERIOD?
· First major service interval: 2-3 years
· Minor maintenance: Every 6-12 months
· Peak performance period: 0-4 years
WEAR ACCELERATION POINT?
· Significant wear becomes apparent: 4-5 years
· Gear backlash measurable degradation
· Bearing wear requires replacement
· Motor brush replacement (if applicable)
END OF ECONOMICAL SERVICE LIFE?
· Too worn for cost-effective service: 6-8 years
· Cumulative wear across multiple systems
· Frame stress fatigue becomes significant
· Electronics obsolescence issues
· Battery capacity below 70% original
AVERAGE LIFESPAN?
· With regular maintenance: 8-10 years
· With major overhauls: 10-12 years
· Economic obsolescence typically occurs before mechanical failure
LIFE CYCLE PHASES Year 0-2: Peak performance, minimal maintenance Year 2-5: Regular part replacement, calibration Year 5-8: Increasing maintenance costs, performance degradation Year 8+: Major overhauls required, economical to replace…..
HYDRAULIC BIO-CLONE HUMANOID?
INITIAL SERVICE PERIOD?
· First major service: 3-4 years
· Fluid/filter changes: Annual
· Peak performance period: 0-5 years
WEAR ACCELERATION POINT?
· Significant wear becomes apparent: 6-8 years
· Hose material fatigue measurable
· Pump efficiency degradation
· Joint surface wear detectable
END OF ECONOMICAL SERVICE LIFE??????
· Too worn for cost-effective service: 12-15 years
· Multiple hydraulic circuit failures
· Eco-material degradation
· Pump replacement required
AVERAGE LIFESPAN?
· With regular maintenance: 15-18 years
· With component regeneration: 20+ years <—————-DIG?
· Gradual performance decline rather than sudden failure…
LIFE CYCLE PHASES Year 0-4: Optimal performance, minimal degradation Year 4-10: Gradual material wear, routine fluid maintenance Year 10-15: Increasing hydraulic component replacement Year 15+: Major system refurbishment, material regeneration…
MY COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS PREDICTION?
TIME TO SIGNIFICANT WEAR Mechanical: 4-5 years Hydraulic: 6-8 years….
ECONOMICAL SERVICE LIFE Mechanical: 6-8 years Hydraulic: 12-15 years….
TOTAL LIFESPAN POTENTIAL Mechanical: 8-12 years Hydraulic: 15-20+ years…
MAINTENANCE INTENSITY CYCLE Mechanical: High frequency, lower cost per service Hydraulic: Lower frequency, higher cost per service…
WEAR PROGRESSION PATTERN Mechanical: Sudden, catastrophic failures Hydraulic: Gradual, performance-degrading failures…
REPLACEMENT CYCLE Mechanical: More frequent full unit replacement Hydraulic: Longer service life with component-level refurbishment…
No arguments left, I win!
~Stateless Warrior
Categories:
People and Blogs
