Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
Charlie Kirk Widow Speech ANALYSIS
Duration: 0:33
Views: 8
Submitted: 1 day ago
Submitted by:
Description:
*GOVERNMENT AGENT FAGS AND CUNTS DEMANDING I RELOCATE TO YOUR AMERICAN ENEMY STATE OF BEW JERSEY TO WORK FORMYOU: I DARE YOU TO COME TOE TO TOE TO MAKE THAT DEMAND CAUSE YOU WOULD BLEED WAY THE FUCK OUT FROM YOUR MITHER FUCKIN AMERICAN AGENT NECKS BEFORE YOU CAN “TOUCH” YOUR FIREARM! Second you demand I joint your federally-fags you will be funeral prepped! Choose your casket color in advance! You see, some wars NEVER END…. You low IQ’d dumb American g-fag agent fucks robbed me of my moyher on 12/06/2017, and I WILL ROB YOU OF ALL YOUR ANTICIPATED “HAPPY ENDINGS!” Welcome to Hell!
Before I begin, my sincerest Condolences to his widow
Because nobody deserves to die being assassinate by a coward who was too much of a chicken shit to debate one on ONE! That stated, I hope that Justice prevails and the shooter is held accountable for his cowardly act! EVERYONE IS ENTITLED UNDER THE LAW TO FREE SPEECH IN USA REGARDLESS OF THEIR PERSONAL CONVICTIONS OR LACK THEREOF! And to prove I support FREE SPEECH I want to invite all to open accounts on my platform and start bitchin, love hitchin, or bullshit ditchin! No rules here but no sex vidoes, homicide videos, and bideoa depicting narcotics use… OMLY FREE SPEECH TRULLY FREE for ALL Non MAGA and MAGA and while I may NOT agree with what you believe in, no reason why we can’t be civil about it and have dialogue! Welcome to FREE SPEECH VIDEO SHARING SITE! Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Mormon Assasinated Wannabe like the one that whacked Charlie, AND YOU CAN EVEN SAY “FUCK USA” or any other. Country EVERY SINGLE DAY and you’ll NEVER BE REPORTED NOR DEPORTED LOL! And as I rollout PAID ADVERTISING, you get OAID for each video view from DAY ONE!
This Company’s slogan addresses issues of ANGER-MANAGEMENT” and it is:
“Come ANGRY, LEAVE HAPPY!”
~Welcome to TRUE FREEDOM!
That stated, I will psychoanalyze Erika Kirk's first public statement disseminated after her husband's assassination because I discovered quite a few intriguing components within it and will for the first time ever, allow you a rare glimpse as to how my mind works… Religious symbolism in her speech clearly PAINTS “martyrdom imagery” and spiritual warfare rhetoric which I find no basis for in THEOLOGY because JESUS wasn’t a MAGA member, while Erika clearly was, is, and will forever be.
Grief and anger is obvious and that’s normal because grieving is a process and we all grieve differently but I examined juxtaposition of vulnerability and defiance in her emotional expression and that means she is a solid woman of conviction and faith, I have no doubt about it in the slightest. What I was looking for is signs of her “political mobilization” as she discussed transformation of her personal tragedy into movement catalyst and noticed her identity reconstruction as she explored negotiation of newly found widowhood into public leadership roles. Moral certainty was without question as I easily identified use of her absolutist language and binary worldview. I think that she will address her grief by continuing her slain husbands mission because she outlined commitment to institutional legacy and personal devotion. Sometimes humans do that subconsciously to keep the memory of their loved one as ALIVE as possible because refusing to let go is perfectly normal… But there “is” a caveat herein for those who profess to “know” Jesus Christ and are “Born Again” of GOD — not the second time physically of their biological mother. See, in the Bible Jesus stated that those who believe in him will NEVER DIE so while the body is MORTAL the Spirit — according to Jesus Christ, is IMMORTAL so when Christians die physically, their soul does. OT so they transition from temporal World seen with a naked eye to ETERNAL invisible to humans. So I wanted to clarify that because in Christian Religion being physically alive is being absent from God the “Heavenly Father” creator of all mankind and entire Universe, while in death Christians transition from this World into Heaven… I felt compelled to clarify this before I continue to give you a deeper understanding of Erika’s faith because that’s the foundation of her “Core VALUE SYSTEM” and when I personally psychoanalyze people I start with their religious convictions because regardless of their religion, all their decision making processes are based upon it so in my view, a complete understanding of an individual requires familiarity with their religious convictions so in case of Erika, according to the Bible, NO HUMAN IS EVER WORTHY enough to enter Heaven because Bible states that human righteousness is like dirty rags, so in Christianity it is Universally solidified as fact that God gave his only begotten Son to die on the Cross for all humanity so Christians are redeemed by his Holly blood while in Islam Jesus Christ is mentioned in Quran but is demeaned as a mere prophet but NOT the son of God which means that Quran was written after Christ not before. That stated, out of all religions in the World today, only Jesus Christ has been confirmed by virtue of first-hand eyewitness testimony to have risen from the dead and ascended into Heaven so if there is a Paradise as well as Hell, and all humans die eventually, it is foolish not to get there because Eternity is a VERY LONG TIME, “FINITE” concept
of “TIME” to GURU of Mathematical science as well as Physics.
So I mentioned all of this to show what drives Erika and what drove from religious aspect, her late husband and of course regardless of what God (as in a Diety…) you pray to, he is not making any more land so humans are very possessive about what they have and Charles made his feelings known but he held some beliefs disparaging racial minorities and that is strictly his own not what the Bible teaches so now that I clarified again I reiterate, religious predispositions of my psychological analysis subject Erika Kirk, I’ll get on with her my take of the rest of her first public statement and will continue with her religious and martyrdom imagery — so I dig in! Again I reiterate that according to the Bible no “man” nor “woman” is ever worthy of entering Heaven, but only through the blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God can anyone ever commune with God because he is Holly therefore, absolute LIGHT and no darkness in him! Furthermore, it is therefore logical to presume that Erika’s slain husband had profound Biblically based hatred towards Homosexuality while plausible to presume based on strict Biblical standards he adhered to, that he felt that God has love for all sinners including homosexuals but wants them to turn from what is biblically classified as “wickedness” because the act of Homosexuality according to the Bible is an “abomination” to God and while the other side of the argument will be presented that homosexuals are born that way, if Charlie Kirk was as devout of a Christian as his wife claims he was, to him Homosexuals and Transgender persons chose to line that way because God makes no mistakes hence if one is BORN a man, he is not a WOMAN and vice versa! So that explains why Charlie Kirk preached against homosexuality and personally felt the way he did and if you ask me, what two Consenting adults do is their own freaking business, but to a devout Christian: “that is the foundation of their core value belief system so by expounding upon it I just revealed to you why Charlie Kirk spoke against it as much and the way he did and was confrontational about this subject and never yielded because he refused to Compromise his principles.. Amd who can argue with God and win, YOU? So read on fools cause on this site I own is nothing my my rules and I wouldn’t be caught DEAD not having an opinion about Only EVERYTHING! Let’s laser focus on Erika cause this post of mine is about her, nothing else!
Erika Kirk's statement is saturated with religious symbolism and martyrdom construction representing a deliberate framing of Charlie Kirk's death within a theological narrative as I aforementioned guiding principles of her religion, Christian faith. Her description of Charlie "wearing the glorious crown of a martyr" and being "received into the merciful arms of Jesus" serves multiple psychological functions I believe… Start with meaning-making for example as she is transforming a random act of violence into a spiritually significant event which I believe based on her Christian CORE VALUES I aforementioned in DEPTH, helps her mitigate the existential terror of sudden loss and I think that majority of humans regardless of their religion, just like Erika will seek solace from their God so this is common however, now that I am on the subject of theology, if the Good is real, he will answer but if false hence dead, supplication ain’t goin beyond the ceiling… This religious framing in humans provides a cognitive framework for understanding tragedy within a cosmic battle between good and evil regardless of of one’s religion and potential for good and evil is Universally believed to be the trait of all humans, but most religions frame it as a battle both within a follower/worshipper and the World at large… One interesting thing I noticed in Erika’s speech is her “legacy sanctification” because by “elevating” Charlie to martyr status, she effectively removes him from ordinary human critique and places him in a protected spiritual category that demands reverence rather than criticism. This is particularly significant given Charlie Kirk's controversial public profile and the constant flow of bullshit on his show so I was amused by that and found her to have an idiosyncratic relationship with the truth, but if she believes that to be true than it is just a difference of opinion! Her statement "Now and for all eternity, he will stand at His Savior's side" demonstrates what psychologists call "identity fusion" - where personal identity becomes merged with a transcendent cause or group identity. This fusion creates powerful motivational states that can override self-preservation instincts. Furthermore: her extensive use of biblical references (that’s why I went in depth outlining her core value religious belief system..). and the visual symbolism of her wearing a cross necklace during the speech suggests either deeply internalized religious worldview or strategic use of religious narrative – I think highly likely both simultaneously given her background in biblical studies.. As far as her expression of grief and anger, Erika's FIRST public statement demonstrates complex interplay between her personal grief as she spews political anger directing it at the assassin of her slain husband and by doing so she to me is revealing what trauma psychologists call "complicated grief" with elements of public performance but she is clearly vulnerable and defiant but lucky for her, she has a lot of people looking out for her to see her through this tragedy. That I observed by virtue of her own admission as she oscillates between raw emotional exposure ("What do you tell a three-year-old?") and defiant proclamation ("You have no idea what you just have unleashed") . This alternation between vulnerable widow and warrior rhetoric creates a powerful emotional cadence that will resonates with different psychological needs in her MAGA audience so I think that it will serve as catalyst for them but will not be a defeat in any way so what we can expect from Americans is a lot more political whacking unfortunately as resort to lethal use of force becomes their means to an end as both their major parties have fruitcakes who will stop at nothing to achieve their objection so that’s why I mention it.. I think that Erika has unresolved trauma because her statement about not remembering when she last slept clearly indicates to me “acute sleep disruption” common in trauma responses especially a heinous bloody assassination so that to me is suggesting she spoke while in a physiologically altered state (her lack of sleep…) that might amplify emotional intensity and reduce inhibitory controls and nothing unusual here cause I bet’chuh if that were you, there’s be a whole lottuh bitchin so Erika is very composed by comparison despite her lack of sleep… Her specific addressing of "evildoers" represents externalization of pain – which a psychological defense mechanism that directs overwhelming emotional distress toward an external target rather than sitting with the unmanageable feelings of loss. This deflection creates a sense of agency amid helplessness so I was glad to notice that in her.. I was laser
focused on her psychological defense mechanisms evident in her statement and externalization was evident with her stating "They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism..." This projects internal pain onto external enemy through sublime channeling of het grief into continued mission work and by doing this humans/ she transforms unacceptable emotions into socially valued activities… As far as her identification, by adopting Charlie's motto "never surrender" she incorporates her assassinated husband’s qualities into self….. Also her reaction formation was noticeable because by transforming her vulnerability into strength she converts unacceptable feelings into opposites…
[*Stateless Warrior Disclaimer quickie: if you don’t want me to psychoanalyze your stupid ass, abstain from posting 16 minute long videos and won’t get inside your stupid head! ]
And now on to Erika’s “political mobilization…” Erika Kirk's statement strategically transforms personal tragedy into political catalyst and I think this is extremely intentional, demonstrating what social psychologists call "collective action framing,” now how did I Conclude that from her short sixteen minute speech?
Crisis exploitation is evident meaning this woman has high intellect and is NOT low on “IQ,” for example… Erika’s declaration that "the movement my husband built will not die" and will become "stronger, bolder, louder and greater than ever" represents what even Amerikkkan sociologists call "productive power of crisis" – using traumatic events to mobilize followers and strengthen movement cohesion and I have no doubt what so ever that Charlie Kirk’s assassination will galvanize MAGA movement and continue to be a catalyst for it long after Trump… This aligns with research showing that perceived martyrdom can significantly increase movement solidarity and let me assure you that if you want to take any movement apart the last thing you should ever do is assassinate any of their prominent leaders because if you do, you never will! That’s human nature! So how does this work? Enemy construction like you would a HOUSE for your brats and wifey! See, the binary rhetoric distinguishing between Charlie's "message of patriotism, faith and God's merciful love" versus the undefined "evildoers" creates clear ingroup/outgroup boundaries that heighten social identity salience so this manipulation of social boundaries is characteristic of populist movements and so assassin of Charlie Kirk would be furious to know that he granted entire MAGA operational continuity…. The specific mention for example that campus tours would continue with "even more tours in the years to come" and that the podcast would continue , actually provides concrete behavioral directives that channel emotional energy into organizational maintenance (like a cool Mexican homey of
mine waxing floors at a Bank at night, performing MAINTENACE…) preventing grief from becoming dissipative…
Keep reading my post dumbasses, I will reveal to you dynamics of human power! Free of any charge!
Erika’s speech effectively performs what social movement theorists call "frame alignment" – connecting individual emotional experiences to collective action frames through processes of amplification, extension, and transformation so to all idiots who wanted to take MAGA out and shut them up, you just handed them a bright new future you low IQ’d idiots, should have debated them instead because now his widow Erika Kirk will navigate a complex identity transition from wife and supporter to movement leader and MAGA RESISTANCE symbol, demonstrating what psychological research calls "posttraumatic growth" with distinctive features and of if I don’t know that having spent three FREAQIN decades being a clinical psychology (Inuse it strictly to profile stalkers with very few exceptions, this being one of them…) aficionado — nobody ever will! Role fusion even in her first video is in abundance and I HAVE NO DOUBT Erika will remain a public figure… Her statement blends traditional spousehood rhetoric ("How do you tell a three-year-old?") with assertive leadership declarations ("I will make Turning Point USA the biggest thing this nation has ever seen") . This represents a “hybrid identity construction" that Erika will use to bridge her conventional gender role (remember she is a devout Christian) with political authority all thanks to a single Utah Mormon retard whom if I were an Agent, would place under a FREAQIN microscope to 360 ANY ASSHOLE HE EVER MET to determine how many more shooters there might be cumin outtuh this woodwork, but I never was and never will cause screwing your stupid minds is my only deal [Satanic GRIN]… Erika’s proclamation "I refuse to let that happen" regarding the movement dying signals to entire American Republic "possible selves" construction – clearly shows that she is already envisioning and committing to a future self that transcends her current “grieving widow” circumstances. This future-oriented self-concept by the way we all got and it is associated with resilience after trauma so I bet you your stupid asses you did just like Erika after a traumatic episode in your life… By the way, if this post helps you deal with any traumatic shit, I want $100.00 in FUCMIN CA$H for that hour I saved you with low IQ’d fuckin shrink!
In her first of what will be many videos, Erika exhibited her public-private negotiation dilemma as she was sharing intimate marital details (Charlie asking daily how to be a better husband and father) while maintaining a defiant public posture which represents strategic management of her current personal-political boundary and her performance merges what was prior her traditionally feminine private sphere with newly mandated by infliction of extreme trauma, masculine public activism in ways that yet as such still resonate with contemporary conservative gender ideologies and which parallel her Christian core values as Erika resorted to moral and absolute language, I mean she did not and does not beat around the bush! What this woman thinks, she will say to your face no problem and her first public statement employs categorical moral language that reveals her "absolutist thinking" – a characteristic associated with ideological rigidity and no way in hell her assasination of her husband can derail her powerful core value system because regardless of what is thrown her way, she resorts to her religious convictions and in case you’re as dumb as a pile of red facade bricks, the most powerful THING in the World are not Nukes, it is RELIGION! As I was sayin, the world is divided into clear categories of good/evil, God/enemy, patriotism/treason, and this is without nuance or gradation…. This binary cognition therefore “reduces” cognitive load on humans during what they deem to be “emotional distress” and provides them psychological certainty amid chaos… And now that I explained that to you, if you reflect on your life when you were emotionally distressed, you will notice that you did exact same thing because you will always gravitate towards CERTAINTY amid chaos and that’s why American g-fags “Gambits of Deception” yields them stupid fucks with LASER PRECISION — but since PsyOpp’s is not the topic of this post, I steer away…
To be continued….
~Stateless Warrior
Before I begin, my sincerest Condolences to his widow
Because nobody deserves to die being assassinate by a coward who was too much of a chicken shit to debate one on ONE! That stated, I hope that Justice prevails and the shooter is held accountable for his cowardly act! EVERYONE IS ENTITLED UNDER THE LAW TO FREE SPEECH IN USA REGARDLESS OF THEIR PERSONAL CONVICTIONS OR LACK THEREOF! And to prove I support FREE SPEECH I want to invite all to open accounts on my platform and start bitchin, love hitchin, or bullshit ditchin! No rules here but no sex vidoes, homicide videos, and bideoa depicting narcotics use… OMLY FREE SPEECH TRULLY FREE for ALL Non MAGA and MAGA and while I may NOT agree with what you believe in, no reason why we can’t be civil about it and have dialogue! Welcome to FREE SPEECH VIDEO SHARING SITE! Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Mormon Assasinated Wannabe like the one that whacked Charlie, AND YOU CAN EVEN SAY “FUCK USA” or any other. Country EVERY SINGLE DAY and you’ll NEVER BE REPORTED NOR DEPORTED LOL! And as I rollout PAID ADVERTISING, you get OAID for each video view from DAY ONE!
This Company’s slogan addresses issues of ANGER-MANAGEMENT” and it is:
“Come ANGRY, LEAVE HAPPY!”
~Welcome to TRUE FREEDOM!
That stated, I will psychoanalyze Erika Kirk's first public statement disseminated after her husband's assassination because I discovered quite a few intriguing components within it and will for the first time ever, allow you a rare glimpse as to how my mind works… Religious symbolism in her speech clearly PAINTS “martyrdom imagery” and spiritual warfare rhetoric which I find no basis for in THEOLOGY because JESUS wasn’t a MAGA member, while Erika clearly was, is, and will forever be.
Grief and anger is obvious and that’s normal because grieving is a process and we all grieve differently but I examined juxtaposition of vulnerability and defiance in her emotional expression and that means she is a solid woman of conviction and faith, I have no doubt about it in the slightest. What I was looking for is signs of her “political mobilization” as she discussed transformation of her personal tragedy into movement catalyst and noticed her identity reconstruction as she explored negotiation of newly found widowhood into public leadership roles. Moral certainty was without question as I easily identified use of her absolutist language and binary worldview. I think that she will address her grief by continuing her slain husbands mission because she outlined commitment to institutional legacy and personal devotion. Sometimes humans do that subconsciously to keep the memory of their loved one as ALIVE as possible because refusing to let go is perfectly normal… But there “is” a caveat herein for those who profess to “know” Jesus Christ and are “Born Again” of GOD — not the second time physically of their biological mother. See, in the Bible Jesus stated that those who believe in him will NEVER DIE so while the body is MORTAL the Spirit — according to Jesus Christ, is IMMORTAL so when Christians die physically, their soul does. OT so they transition from temporal World seen with a naked eye to ETERNAL invisible to humans. So I wanted to clarify that because in Christian Religion being physically alive is being absent from God the “Heavenly Father” creator of all mankind and entire Universe, while in death Christians transition from this World into Heaven… I felt compelled to clarify this before I continue to give you a deeper understanding of Erika’s faith because that’s the foundation of her “Core VALUE SYSTEM” and when I personally psychoanalyze people I start with their religious convictions because regardless of their religion, all their decision making processes are based upon it so in my view, a complete understanding of an individual requires familiarity with their religious convictions so in case of Erika, according to the Bible, NO HUMAN IS EVER WORTHY enough to enter Heaven because Bible states that human righteousness is like dirty rags, so in Christianity it is Universally solidified as fact that God gave his only begotten Son to die on the Cross for all humanity so Christians are redeemed by his Holly blood while in Islam Jesus Christ is mentioned in Quran but is demeaned as a mere prophet but NOT the son of God which means that Quran was written after Christ not before. That stated, out of all religions in the World today, only Jesus Christ has been confirmed by virtue of first-hand eyewitness testimony to have risen from the dead and ascended into Heaven so if there is a Paradise as well as Hell, and all humans die eventually, it is foolish not to get there because Eternity is a VERY LONG TIME, “FINITE” concept
of “TIME” to GURU of Mathematical science as well as Physics.
So I mentioned all of this to show what drives Erika and what drove from religious aspect, her late husband and of course regardless of what God (as in a Diety…) you pray to, he is not making any more land so humans are very possessive about what they have and Charles made his feelings known but he held some beliefs disparaging racial minorities and that is strictly his own not what the Bible teaches so now that I clarified again I reiterate, religious predispositions of my psychological analysis subject Erika Kirk, I’ll get on with her my take of the rest of her first public statement and will continue with her religious and martyrdom imagery — so I dig in! Again I reiterate that according to the Bible no “man” nor “woman” is ever worthy of entering Heaven, but only through the blood of Jesus Christ the Son of God can anyone ever commune with God because he is Holly therefore, absolute LIGHT and no darkness in him! Furthermore, it is therefore logical to presume that Erika’s slain husband had profound Biblically based hatred towards Homosexuality while plausible to presume based on strict Biblical standards he adhered to, that he felt that God has love for all sinners including homosexuals but wants them to turn from what is biblically classified as “wickedness” because the act of Homosexuality according to the Bible is an “abomination” to God and while the other side of the argument will be presented that homosexuals are born that way, if Charlie Kirk was as devout of a Christian as his wife claims he was, to him Homosexuals and Transgender persons chose to line that way because God makes no mistakes hence if one is BORN a man, he is not a WOMAN and vice versa! So that explains why Charlie Kirk preached against homosexuality and personally felt the way he did and if you ask me, what two Consenting adults do is their own freaking business, but to a devout Christian: “that is the foundation of their core value belief system so by expounding upon it I just revealed to you why Charlie Kirk spoke against it as much and the way he did and was confrontational about this subject and never yielded because he refused to Compromise his principles.. Amd who can argue with God and win, YOU? So read on fools cause on this site I own is nothing my my rules and I wouldn’t be caught DEAD not having an opinion about Only EVERYTHING! Let’s laser focus on Erika cause this post of mine is about her, nothing else!
Erika Kirk's statement is saturated with religious symbolism and martyrdom construction representing a deliberate framing of Charlie Kirk's death within a theological narrative as I aforementioned guiding principles of her religion, Christian faith. Her description of Charlie "wearing the glorious crown of a martyr" and being "received into the merciful arms of Jesus" serves multiple psychological functions I believe… Start with meaning-making for example as she is transforming a random act of violence into a spiritually significant event which I believe based on her Christian CORE VALUES I aforementioned in DEPTH, helps her mitigate the existential terror of sudden loss and I think that majority of humans regardless of their religion, just like Erika will seek solace from their God so this is common however, now that I am on the subject of theology, if the Good is real, he will answer but if false hence dead, supplication ain’t goin beyond the ceiling… This religious framing in humans provides a cognitive framework for understanding tragedy within a cosmic battle between good and evil regardless of of one’s religion and potential for good and evil is Universally believed to be the trait of all humans, but most religions frame it as a battle both within a follower/worshipper and the World at large… One interesting thing I noticed in Erika’s speech is her “legacy sanctification” because by “elevating” Charlie to martyr status, she effectively removes him from ordinary human critique and places him in a protected spiritual category that demands reverence rather than criticism. This is particularly significant given Charlie Kirk's controversial public profile and the constant flow of bullshit on his show so I was amused by that and found her to have an idiosyncratic relationship with the truth, but if she believes that to be true than it is just a difference of opinion! Her statement "Now and for all eternity, he will stand at His Savior's side" demonstrates what psychologists call "identity fusion" - where personal identity becomes merged with a transcendent cause or group identity. This fusion creates powerful motivational states that can override self-preservation instincts. Furthermore: her extensive use of biblical references (that’s why I went in depth outlining her core value religious belief system..). and the visual symbolism of her wearing a cross necklace during the speech suggests either deeply internalized religious worldview or strategic use of religious narrative – I think highly likely both simultaneously given her background in biblical studies.. As far as her expression of grief and anger, Erika's FIRST public statement demonstrates complex interplay between her personal grief as she spews political anger directing it at the assassin of her slain husband and by doing so she to me is revealing what trauma psychologists call "complicated grief" with elements of public performance but she is clearly vulnerable and defiant but lucky for her, she has a lot of people looking out for her to see her through this tragedy. That I observed by virtue of her own admission as she oscillates between raw emotional exposure ("What do you tell a three-year-old?") and defiant proclamation ("You have no idea what you just have unleashed") . This alternation between vulnerable widow and warrior rhetoric creates a powerful emotional cadence that will resonates with different psychological needs in her MAGA audience so I think that it will serve as catalyst for them but will not be a defeat in any way so what we can expect from Americans is a lot more political whacking unfortunately as resort to lethal use of force becomes their means to an end as both their major parties have fruitcakes who will stop at nothing to achieve their objection so that’s why I mention it.. I think that Erika has unresolved trauma because her statement about not remembering when she last slept clearly indicates to me “acute sleep disruption” common in trauma responses especially a heinous bloody assassination so that to me is suggesting she spoke while in a physiologically altered state (her lack of sleep…) that might amplify emotional intensity and reduce inhibitory controls and nothing unusual here cause I bet’chuh if that were you, there’s be a whole lottuh bitchin so Erika is very composed by comparison despite her lack of sleep… Her specific addressing of "evildoers" represents externalization of pain – which a psychological defense mechanism that directs overwhelming emotional distress toward an external target rather than sitting with the unmanageable feelings of loss. This deflection creates a sense of agency amid helplessness so I was glad to notice that in her.. I was laser
focused on her psychological defense mechanisms evident in her statement and externalization was evident with her stating "They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism..." This projects internal pain onto external enemy through sublime channeling of het grief into continued mission work and by doing this humans/ she transforms unacceptable emotions into socially valued activities… As far as her identification, by adopting Charlie's motto "never surrender" she incorporates her assassinated husband’s qualities into self….. Also her reaction formation was noticeable because by transforming her vulnerability into strength she converts unacceptable feelings into opposites…
[*Stateless Warrior Disclaimer quickie: if you don’t want me to psychoanalyze your stupid ass, abstain from posting 16 minute long videos and won’t get inside your stupid head! ]
And now on to Erika’s “political mobilization…” Erika Kirk's statement strategically transforms personal tragedy into political catalyst and I think this is extremely intentional, demonstrating what social psychologists call "collective action framing,” now how did I Conclude that from her short sixteen minute speech?
Crisis exploitation is evident meaning this woman has high intellect and is NOT low on “IQ,” for example… Erika’s declaration that "the movement my husband built will not die" and will become "stronger, bolder, louder and greater than ever" represents what even Amerikkkan sociologists call "productive power of crisis" – using traumatic events to mobilize followers and strengthen movement cohesion and I have no doubt what so ever that Charlie Kirk’s assassination will galvanize MAGA movement and continue to be a catalyst for it long after Trump… This aligns with research showing that perceived martyrdom can significantly increase movement solidarity and let me assure you that if you want to take any movement apart the last thing you should ever do is assassinate any of their prominent leaders because if you do, you never will! That’s human nature! So how does this work? Enemy construction like you would a HOUSE for your brats and wifey! See, the binary rhetoric distinguishing between Charlie's "message of patriotism, faith and God's merciful love" versus the undefined "evildoers" creates clear ingroup/outgroup boundaries that heighten social identity salience so this manipulation of social boundaries is characteristic of populist movements and so assassin of Charlie Kirk would be furious to know that he granted entire MAGA operational continuity…. The specific mention for example that campus tours would continue with "even more tours in the years to come" and that the podcast would continue , actually provides concrete behavioral directives that channel emotional energy into organizational maintenance (like a cool Mexican homey of
mine waxing floors at a Bank at night, performing MAINTENACE…) preventing grief from becoming dissipative…
Keep reading my post dumbasses, I will reveal to you dynamics of human power! Free of any charge!
Erika’s speech effectively performs what social movement theorists call "frame alignment" – connecting individual emotional experiences to collective action frames through processes of amplification, extension, and transformation so to all idiots who wanted to take MAGA out and shut them up, you just handed them a bright new future you low IQ’d idiots, should have debated them instead because now his widow Erika Kirk will navigate a complex identity transition from wife and supporter to movement leader and MAGA RESISTANCE symbol, demonstrating what psychological research calls "posttraumatic growth" with distinctive features and of if I don’t know that having spent three FREAQIN decades being a clinical psychology (Inuse it strictly to profile stalkers with very few exceptions, this being one of them…) aficionado — nobody ever will! Role fusion even in her first video is in abundance and I HAVE NO DOUBT Erika will remain a public figure… Her statement blends traditional spousehood rhetoric ("How do you tell a three-year-old?") with assertive leadership declarations ("I will make Turning Point USA the biggest thing this nation has ever seen") . This represents a “hybrid identity construction" that Erika will use to bridge her conventional gender role (remember she is a devout Christian) with political authority all thanks to a single Utah Mormon retard whom if I were an Agent, would place under a FREAQIN microscope to 360 ANY ASSHOLE HE EVER MET to determine how many more shooters there might be cumin outtuh this woodwork, but I never was and never will cause screwing your stupid minds is my only deal [Satanic GRIN]… Erika’s proclamation "I refuse to let that happen" regarding the movement dying signals to entire American Republic "possible selves" construction – clearly shows that she is already envisioning and committing to a future self that transcends her current “grieving widow” circumstances. This future-oriented self-concept by the way we all got and it is associated with resilience after trauma so I bet you your stupid asses you did just like Erika after a traumatic episode in your life… By the way, if this post helps you deal with any traumatic shit, I want $100.00 in FUCMIN CA$H for that hour I saved you with low IQ’d fuckin shrink!
In her first of what will be many videos, Erika exhibited her public-private negotiation dilemma as she was sharing intimate marital details (Charlie asking daily how to be a better husband and father) while maintaining a defiant public posture which represents strategic management of her current personal-political boundary and her performance merges what was prior her traditionally feminine private sphere with newly mandated by infliction of extreme trauma, masculine public activism in ways that yet as such still resonate with contemporary conservative gender ideologies and which parallel her Christian core values as Erika resorted to moral and absolute language, I mean she did not and does not beat around the bush! What this woman thinks, she will say to your face no problem and her first public statement employs categorical moral language that reveals her "absolutist thinking" – a characteristic associated with ideological rigidity and no way in hell her assasination of her husband can derail her powerful core value system because regardless of what is thrown her way, she resorts to her religious convictions and in case you’re as dumb as a pile of red facade bricks, the most powerful THING in the World are not Nukes, it is RELIGION! As I was sayin, the world is divided into clear categories of good/evil, God/enemy, patriotism/treason, and this is without nuance or gradation…. This binary cognition therefore “reduces” cognitive load on humans during what they deem to be “emotional distress” and provides them psychological certainty amid chaos… And now that I explained that to you, if you reflect on your life when you were emotionally distressed, you will notice that you did exact same thing because you will always gravitate towards CERTAINTY amid chaos and that’s why American g-fags “Gambits of Deception” yields them stupid fucks with LASER PRECISION — but since PsyOpp’s is not the topic of this post, I steer away…
To be continued….
~Stateless Warrior
Categories:
People and Blogs
