Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
G7 vs G8?
Duration: 0:39
Views: 21
Submitted: 3 weeks ago
Submitted by:
Description:
Did O’Bama make a mistake by kicking Putin out?
Putin is a TRAINED KILLER who assassinates his political opponents so O’Bama actually made the right call!
What about Trump’s assertion that leaving Putin at the table would have kept him from invading Ukraine?
Trump is an idiot! O’Bama had nothing to do with that but we could infer Trump likes to use people of color as scapegoats!
The culprit was Bill Clinton and it was when he talked Ukrainian Government into parting with their nukes, second they did: “THEIR FATE WAS SEALED!”
Putin is an opportunist just like all the other trained government assasin who kill their way to the top, if they smell blood they go for the jugular! I would have never advised them to surrender their nukes but would have made them my besties in political arsenal and instead opened several embassies to plant roots of long term friendship cause they could spit and nukes go off in Moscow which would not have been necessary because it was a Nuclear gun pointed at Putin’s head compelling him to behave!
Any impact on Global economics — with Russia’s assassin out?
Benefits of not having a Siccario in your inner circle are countless but I’m a break the Math down for you.. Mathematically, Analysis of G8 vs. G7 Impact on the World Economy (Pre & Post Russia's Exclusion) you get by first analyzing the G8 (including Russia) vs. the G7 (excluding Russia) mathematically focusing on economic weight and contribution to global growth. Dig? Causality is complex, but you can compare key aggregate metrics before and after Russia's suspension so, “Core Metrics & Data Sources” for this quickie? GDP (Nominal & PPP), IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO), World Bank. The usual…. Global GDP Share? Calculated from above — duh — hello, anyone home? Global Trade Share? WTO data (Merchandise Trade). Global Growth Contribution? Calculated using GDP growth rates and shares.
Periods: Pre-Suspension (Representative: 2000-2013 avg), Post-Suspension? )Note that I think 2014 is transition year..)
So, my “Mathematical Framework & Analysis?” Aggregate Economic Size (GDP)? My mathematical formula is “GX_GDP = Σ” (GDP_member) for all members in GX so “Pre-Suspension” G8 Avg ~2000-2013” G8 Nominal GDP Share: ~50-55% of Global GDP so G8 PPP GDP Share: ~45-50% of Global GDP
“Post-Suspension” (G7 Avg ~2015-2023 for example?)
G7 Nominal GDP Share ~43-48% of Global GDP (e.g., ~44% in 2023 - IMF) G7 PPP GDP Share ~30-35% of Global GDP (e.g., ~30.4% in 2023 - IMF) so my mathematical observation?
G8_GDP_Share_Pre > G7_GDP_Share_Post (Significantly for PPP). Simple CAKEWALK! Primary Driver?This decline is overwhelmingly due to the rise of emerging economies (especially China, India), not Russia's exclusion but Trump
Is free to finger point cause he sucks in Math lol! Russia itself was only ~3% of global nominal GDP and ~3.5% of global PPP GDP pre-2014 so removing Russia mathematically reduces the aggregate, but the dominant trend is the shift away from all advanced economies. Contribution to Global GDP Growth?
Formula? Contribution_GX = (Growth_Rate_GX GDP_Share_GX) / Global_Growth_Rate
Simplified annual contribution:?Growth_GX * GDP_Share_GX (Provides growth p.p. contribution). So “Pre-Suspension” (G8 ~2000-2013 Avg)? G8 Growth Rate? Moderate (e.g., 1.5-2.5% avg)….
G8 GDP Share? High (~50-55% nominal) — and Contribution? Significant driver of global growth (e.g., contributing 0.75 - 1.25 p.p. to a global growth of ~3-4%). Post-Suspension (G7 ~2015-2023 Avg)? G7 Growth Rate? Generally lower (e.g., 1.0-2.0% avg, excluding post-Covid rebound volatility) — and G7 GDP Share? Declining (~43-48% nominal)… And contribution? Substantially reduced (e.g., contributing 0.4 - 0.9 p.p. to global growth, which itself often slowed). So, my mathematical observation? Contribution_G8_Pre > Contribution_G7_Post, dig?
Primary Driver? Again, the declining share of the G7/G8 bloc and slower relative growth rates within the bloc compared to emerging economies are the key mathematical factors. Russia's exclusion itself had a “negligible direct mathematical impact” on the G7's growth contribution calculation (<0.1 p.p. typically). And “Global Trade Share?” Formula: GX_Trade_Share = (Σ(Exports_member) + Σ(Imports_member)) / 2 / Global_Trade as “Pre-Suspension” (G8 ~2000-2013) so… G8 accounted for ~50%+ of world merchandise trade. What about” Post-Suspension” (G7 ~2015-2023)? G7 accounts for ~30-35% of world merchandise trade.
I’m a walk you through my “Mathematical Observation” quickly again here… G8_Trade_Share_Pre > G7_Trade_Share_Post
Primary Driver? Overwhelmingly the rise of global value chains centered in Asia and increased South-South trade. Russia was a significant energy trader but not dominant in manufactured goods cause Russians are too stupid to turn their nation into a Global Factory, just like American government and its corporate monkeys who ensured that number one product in USA is none other than consumer debt through predatory lending! Reddit scoring system engineered by their banks called FICO (It should be “FUCKO…”) and in order to achieve a score of 800 you must have bowed and repaid $100,000K @22/23% APR — WHOA, Mafia loanshark shit territory but back to Russian g-fag exclusion analysis..
We can easily mathematically conclude that Russia’s exclusion had a minor direct mathematical effect on the G7's aggregate trade share so Trump is wrong 360 on this one and if he thought that would have prevented Putin from invading Ukraine is 100% absolute bullshit cause the second Ukrainians parted with nukes they removed from their soil the ONLY THING that kept Russian communist hardliners of Kremlin at bay cause sure as Hell it wasn’t NATO! The Russia Factor - Isolating the Impact?
Direct Mathematical Impact (Size/Contribution): Negligible. Russia's weight within the G8 was relatively small (typically the smallest economy). Removing it mathematically reduced the G8 aggregate GDP by ~5-7%, trade by ~3-5%, and growth contribution by a fraction of a percentage point, that is freaqin all!
Indirect Geopolitical/Economic Impact (Non-Mathematical)? This is the significant consequence of exclusion though… Sanctions & Countersanctions (2014+? Disrupted trade/investment flows between G7 and Russia, impacting specific sectors (energy, finance, agriculture) in both regions. This is a bilateral/multilateral impact — but “not” a change in the G7's internal aggregate weight. Fragmentation? Accelerated geopolitical divides, potentially reducing global efficiency and growth (hard to quantify precisely). And G7 Focus?Allowed the G7 to coordinate economic policies (sanctions, supply chains) more cohesively without Russia, but against it.
So what is fact and what Trump’s, Putin’s, or anyone elses’s bullshit here? Mathematical vs. Geopolitical Reality?Mathematically — the difference between the G8 aggregate (pre-2014) and the G7 aggregate (post-2014) in terms of global GDP share, trade share, and growth contribution is primarily driven by the long-term structural shift of economic weight towards emerging economies — particularly in Asia. Russia's direct exclusion mathematically reduced these aggregates, but only by a small margin (a few percentage points). The dominant trend is the declining relative weight of the entire advanced economy bloc. And what about “Economically/Geopolitically?” Russia's exclusion from the G8 had a profound impact — not captured by simple aggregates, how so? It marked a deep geopolitical rupture as it facilitated coordinated G7 sanctions, disrupting specific trade and financial flows…. “Emphasis on word FLOWS!”
It contributed to a more fragmented global economic system.
It fundamentally changed the nature of the forum from an inclusive (though imperfect) "director's table" of major economies to a coalition of like-minded advanced democracies focused partly on containing Russia, but then again kudos to President O’Bama who figured out that Russia was a FAKE DEMOCRACY and kicked Kremlin communists outtuh G8!” In essence, Mathematically, the G7 today is a slightly smaller version of the old G8 bloc, which itself has shrunk relative to the world. However, the act of excluding Russia transformed the group's purpose and triggered significant geopolitical-economic consequences that simple aggregate mathematics cannot capture so this story is less about the math of the bloc's size and more about the geopolitical signal and the resulting economic countermeasures and Trump’s nostalgia for Putin’s presence at the G-Summit table is of great concern now that Putin has shown his true colors and cannot hide the fact that he is a Dictator.
Perhaps Trump needs to reasess his own actions Stateside before he ends up turning USA into just another copy of fuckin Russia…
Meanwhile, fuck this MAGA douche and long live LIBERTY!
Putin is a TRAINED KILLER who assassinates his political opponents so O’Bama actually made the right call!
What about Trump’s assertion that leaving Putin at the table would have kept him from invading Ukraine?
Trump is an idiot! O’Bama had nothing to do with that but we could infer Trump likes to use people of color as scapegoats!
The culprit was Bill Clinton and it was when he talked Ukrainian Government into parting with their nukes, second they did: “THEIR FATE WAS SEALED!”
Putin is an opportunist just like all the other trained government assasin who kill their way to the top, if they smell blood they go for the jugular! I would have never advised them to surrender their nukes but would have made them my besties in political arsenal and instead opened several embassies to plant roots of long term friendship cause they could spit and nukes go off in Moscow which would not have been necessary because it was a Nuclear gun pointed at Putin’s head compelling him to behave!
Any impact on Global economics — with Russia’s assassin out?
Benefits of not having a Siccario in your inner circle are countless but I’m a break the Math down for you.. Mathematically, Analysis of G8 vs. G7 Impact on the World Economy (Pre & Post Russia's Exclusion) you get by first analyzing the G8 (including Russia) vs. the G7 (excluding Russia) mathematically focusing on economic weight and contribution to global growth. Dig? Causality is complex, but you can compare key aggregate metrics before and after Russia's suspension so, “Core Metrics & Data Sources” for this quickie? GDP (Nominal & PPP), IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO), World Bank. The usual…. Global GDP Share? Calculated from above — duh — hello, anyone home? Global Trade Share? WTO data (Merchandise Trade). Global Growth Contribution? Calculated using GDP growth rates and shares.
Periods: Pre-Suspension (Representative: 2000-2013 avg), Post-Suspension? )Note that I think 2014 is transition year..)
So, my “Mathematical Framework & Analysis?” Aggregate Economic Size (GDP)? My mathematical formula is “GX_GDP = Σ” (GDP_member) for all members in GX so “Pre-Suspension” G8 Avg ~2000-2013” G8 Nominal GDP Share: ~50-55% of Global GDP so G8 PPP GDP Share: ~45-50% of Global GDP
“Post-Suspension” (G7 Avg ~2015-2023 for example?)
G7 Nominal GDP Share ~43-48% of Global GDP (e.g., ~44% in 2023 - IMF) G7 PPP GDP Share ~30-35% of Global GDP (e.g., ~30.4% in 2023 - IMF) so my mathematical observation?
G8_GDP_Share_Pre > G7_GDP_Share_Post (Significantly for PPP). Simple CAKEWALK! Primary Driver?This decline is overwhelmingly due to the rise of emerging economies (especially China, India), not Russia's exclusion but Trump
Is free to finger point cause he sucks in Math lol! Russia itself was only ~3% of global nominal GDP and ~3.5% of global PPP GDP pre-2014 so removing Russia mathematically reduces the aggregate, but the dominant trend is the shift away from all advanced economies. Contribution to Global GDP Growth?
Formula? Contribution_GX = (Growth_Rate_GX GDP_Share_GX) / Global_Growth_Rate
Simplified annual contribution:?Growth_GX * GDP_Share_GX (Provides growth p.p. contribution). So “Pre-Suspension” (G8 ~2000-2013 Avg)? G8 Growth Rate? Moderate (e.g., 1.5-2.5% avg)….
G8 GDP Share? High (~50-55% nominal) — and Contribution? Significant driver of global growth (e.g., contributing 0.75 - 1.25 p.p. to a global growth of ~3-4%). Post-Suspension (G7 ~2015-2023 Avg)? G7 Growth Rate? Generally lower (e.g., 1.0-2.0% avg, excluding post-Covid rebound volatility) — and G7 GDP Share? Declining (~43-48% nominal)… And contribution? Substantially reduced (e.g., contributing 0.4 - 0.9 p.p. to global growth, which itself often slowed). So, my mathematical observation? Contribution_G8_Pre > Contribution_G7_Post, dig?
Primary Driver? Again, the declining share of the G7/G8 bloc and slower relative growth rates within the bloc compared to emerging economies are the key mathematical factors. Russia's exclusion itself had a “negligible direct mathematical impact” on the G7's growth contribution calculation (<0.1 p.p. typically). And “Global Trade Share?” Formula: GX_Trade_Share = (Σ(Exports_member) + Σ(Imports_member)) / 2 / Global_Trade as “Pre-Suspension” (G8 ~2000-2013) so… G8 accounted for ~50%+ of world merchandise trade. What about” Post-Suspension” (G7 ~2015-2023)? G7 accounts for ~30-35% of world merchandise trade.
I’m a walk you through my “Mathematical Observation” quickly again here… G8_Trade_Share_Pre > G7_Trade_Share_Post
Primary Driver? Overwhelmingly the rise of global value chains centered in Asia and increased South-South trade. Russia was a significant energy trader but not dominant in manufactured goods cause Russians are too stupid to turn their nation into a Global Factory, just like American government and its corporate monkeys who ensured that number one product in USA is none other than consumer debt through predatory lending! Reddit scoring system engineered by their banks called FICO (It should be “FUCKO…”) and in order to achieve a score of 800 you must have bowed and repaid $100,000K @22/23% APR — WHOA, Mafia loanshark shit territory but back to Russian g-fag exclusion analysis..
We can easily mathematically conclude that Russia’s exclusion had a minor direct mathematical effect on the G7's aggregate trade share so Trump is wrong 360 on this one and if he thought that would have prevented Putin from invading Ukraine is 100% absolute bullshit cause the second Ukrainians parted with nukes they removed from their soil the ONLY THING that kept Russian communist hardliners of Kremlin at bay cause sure as Hell it wasn’t NATO! The Russia Factor - Isolating the Impact?
Direct Mathematical Impact (Size/Contribution): Negligible. Russia's weight within the G8 was relatively small (typically the smallest economy). Removing it mathematically reduced the G8 aggregate GDP by ~5-7%, trade by ~3-5%, and growth contribution by a fraction of a percentage point, that is freaqin all!
Indirect Geopolitical/Economic Impact (Non-Mathematical)? This is the significant consequence of exclusion though… Sanctions & Countersanctions (2014+? Disrupted trade/investment flows between G7 and Russia, impacting specific sectors (energy, finance, agriculture) in both regions. This is a bilateral/multilateral impact — but “not” a change in the G7's internal aggregate weight. Fragmentation? Accelerated geopolitical divides, potentially reducing global efficiency and growth (hard to quantify precisely). And G7 Focus?Allowed the G7 to coordinate economic policies (sanctions, supply chains) more cohesively without Russia, but against it.
So what is fact and what Trump’s, Putin’s, or anyone elses’s bullshit here? Mathematical vs. Geopolitical Reality?Mathematically — the difference between the G8 aggregate (pre-2014) and the G7 aggregate (post-2014) in terms of global GDP share, trade share, and growth contribution is primarily driven by the long-term structural shift of economic weight towards emerging economies — particularly in Asia. Russia's direct exclusion mathematically reduced these aggregates, but only by a small margin (a few percentage points). The dominant trend is the declining relative weight of the entire advanced economy bloc. And what about “Economically/Geopolitically?” Russia's exclusion from the G8 had a profound impact — not captured by simple aggregates, how so? It marked a deep geopolitical rupture as it facilitated coordinated G7 sanctions, disrupting specific trade and financial flows…. “Emphasis on word FLOWS!”
It contributed to a more fragmented global economic system.
It fundamentally changed the nature of the forum from an inclusive (though imperfect) "director's table" of major economies to a coalition of like-minded advanced democracies focused partly on containing Russia, but then again kudos to President O’Bama who figured out that Russia was a FAKE DEMOCRACY and kicked Kremlin communists outtuh G8!” In essence, Mathematically, the G7 today is a slightly smaller version of the old G8 bloc, which itself has shrunk relative to the world. However, the act of excluding Russia transformed the group's purpose and triggered significant geopolitical-economic consequences that simple aggregate mathematics cannot capture so this story is less about the math of the bloc's size and more about the geopolitical signal and the resulting economic countermeasures and Trump’s nostalgia for Putin’s presence at the G-Summit table is of great concern now that Putin has shown his true colors and cannot hide the fact that he is a Dictator.
Perhaps Trump needs to reasess his own actions Stateside before he ends up turning USA into just another copy of fuckin Russia…
Meanwhile, fuck this MAGA douche and long live LIBERTY!
Categories:
People and Blogs
