Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
LAPD FAGS HANDCUFFING REPORTERS AND SUCKING THEM OFF
Duration: 1:47
Views: 46
Submitted: 2 months ago
Submitted by:
Description:
With rubber bullets… See a reporter? A woman? These LAPeeDick’s AIM for her leg and SHOOT her with rubber bullets! Fuckin COWARD POLICE PSYCHO!
Why?
To force them to stop reporting so they can shoot PROTESTERS at random which is just the usual in Los Angeles where the REAL CRIMINALS are NEVER CAUGHT because they HIDE INSIDE CARS emblazoned with POLICE insignia and once they handcuff and shoot reporters nothing will be on video!
I call on Hollywood to STOP GLORIFYING STUPID LAPD PIGS!
But HOW do you get criminals in LA to answer the phone in LA?
Just call 911 — wink, wink!
*Video footage analysis:
I will start with CNN Reporter Mr. Jason FIRST and then after address the FELONY ASSAULT by LAPD officer against Australian Reporter so Mr. Jason who was reporting for CNN was placed in handcuffs to FEAR HIM UP apparently — and then told by LAPD officers who illegally handcuffed him that he will be arrested if he returns. The Australian Reporter I will address after I outline case Mr. Jason has against LAPD — could be seen in physical PAIN after an LAPD officer first looks at her and sees that she is REPORTING for a news channel, aims directly at her — and then fires and hits her in the leg…
So what can you do as a Reporter when LAPD pigz handcuff you unlawfully?
You are soo lucky you are HERE and NOT there or some other stupid site… I’m a GUIDE you like a little fuckin bitch, but you as a Reporter should know all this shit so you must be fuckin stupid?
Are you stupid? Just kidding — stupid ass! Okay then, lemme review their PIGZ R’Us LAPD-FUNKY FUCKIN MONKEY DOKKKUMENTS and I’m a hitchuh cause they might beat’chuh?
Filing a misconduct report against an LAPD officer for unlawfully detaining YOU a CNN journalist requires careful documentation and adherence to their LAPeeDick official channels so according to their LAPD's official procedures and California law which I just checked, your “Critical First Steps” (Within 24-48 Hours) is to
think (no need to be one unless you fancy YERzelf (just coined a new word in Urban English, accreditation please to StatelASS Warrior..) an Officer already in which case I want to remind you that in LA Pigz do fly — in a pig helicopter…) like a LAPD pigglet and “Preserve Evidence’ (I smell a fuckin payday for Pokice. Totality Law$UIT, nice goin bitch!) and for goodne$$$ $$$ake$$$ secure the unedited video footage (from the New York Times reporter who witnessed your unlawful detention, any statements from bystanders, or your CNN bitch ass BITCHIN’ news crew).
Note exact date, time, location, and LAPeeDick officer badge numbers/patrol car numbers, ALL OF IT MOTHER FUCKER, okay? Sorry for my profanity but you are FUCKIN STUPID YOU LAMER! Just kidding… Also gather witness contact info (even from your crew members, and also bystanders) and then lawyer the fuck up and file a Formal Complaint which is pretty easy as LAPD accepts complaints Online so just GOOGLE their LAPD Online Complaint Form URL or RING their filthy asses and whine and bitch to their Internal Affairs DiVISION @ (213) 485-1486
or in Person at any LAPD station or their Police Administration Building (100 W 1st St, LA 90012) which you can easily spot
from a mile away cause all the Pigz will be cumming and goin!
Key Details you must Include as you “State clearly” on and for the fuckin record is the following and I advise you start with "First Amendment Retaliation" which is what it seems to me and then classify your handcuffing which due to being unlawful to me appears to be a "False Arrest" not just to milk Muh dinero outtuh litigious civil route which is almost as straightforward as freeway fucker called “101,” Aaight?
Specify and write using my exact verbiage:
“Reporter was detained while recording news footage on a public street without interfering with police activity in direct violation of Glik v. Cunniffe (1st Circuit, 2011) and California Penal Code § 409.7(d) (right to record police because California State Law allows for recording of pigglets whenever they are INTERacting with you and throwing a fuckin monkey for and perhaps even goin’ Apeshit on ya?).. Reference LAPD Special Order 7 VIOLATION (respecting media access) and bend over so Internal Affairs can see your gaping asshole officer g-fag jackhammered to be the Size of AmeriKan State of Alaska!
Following from their Pig’z of LA Official Monkey-Site…
Parallel Reporting (Essential for Accountability)
Los Angeles Police Commission
File online: Police Commission Complaint
Email: PAC.complaints@lacity.org
Why?: This civilian oversight board investigates officer misconduct independently.
California Department of Justice
Submit to the Civil Rights Enforcement Section: CA DOT Complaint Portal
Cite: Violation of the Bane Act (CA Civil Code § 52.1) and 1st Amendment.
Federal Options
ACLU of Southern California: Report Police Misconduct
U.S. DOJ Civil Rights Division: (800) 253-3931 or DOT Complaint Form
Legal Action
Consult a Civil Rights Attorney
Demand bodycam footage (LAPD Policy: Must release within 45 days per SB 1421).
My Case Law LookUP For Hour Potential lawsuits:
Have your lawyer monkey lookup their AmeriKKKan 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Federal civil rights violation)
also check their State of LAPeeDick Baboonforniuh’s “False imprisonment (CA Penal Code § 236) Statute,” and if you can’t affirms blood suckin lawyer without one having been appointed for you seek “Pro Bono Help” and “Contact National Lawyers Guild” (LA) or “AmeriKKKan First Amendment Coalition.”
My Personal LAPD-Specific Notes You Might Benefit From Knowing?
LAPD Monkey Wannuh Go Apeshit On Ya Retaliation Protection: LAPD prohibits retaliation against complainants (I just checked their LAPD Manual § 3/723.90), but; bare in mind Pigs are Pigs so if you leave LA their buddies are everywhere and you might oddly discover yourself the subject of arbitrary traffic stops wherever you set foot in USA so just BEWARE, okay?
Timeline You’z Lookin At? Their Internal Investigations can take 6-12 months so do request a complaint number for tracking.
If YOU are Stonewalled by LAPeeDick Pighletz I Suggest YOUR ASS: Contact the LA City Controller (213-978-7200) or your City Council member.
Sample Complaint Language I drafted for ya cause I was bored outtuh my fuckin mind, not that I want to help you at all…
"On [Date], Officer [Dipshit’s Badge #] detained [Your Fuckin Name], a credentialed journalist visibly recording with professional equipment, at [Location]. I being a bona-fide Reporter with fake news channel “CNN” identified myself as press while attempting to hit ‘em LAPeeD Pigz for a free pass and stated they were attempting to detain me on public fuckin property. Despite no lawful basis, LA Pee Dick officers applied handcuffs for approximately [State Duration Of Time Soend Assfucked/ I mean Detained in LAPig Cuffs], violating LAPD Special Order 7 and the 1st Amendment. Request: 1) Disciplinary action, 2) Release of all bodycam footage, 3) Policy retraining."
and a million dollars in FUCKIN CA$H for mental anguish, pain, suffering, and PTSD syndrome but I can also take a check made out to CASH so I don’t have to report it to IRS and can leave the last A$$ for “$ABING$” and LAW$UIT CRAVING$!
But while I made you burst with laughter, lemme stop my satire and get serious cause the officer violated you like a mother fucker so how bout you teach them a lawsuit lesson so they never fuck with you again because in California detaining and handcuffing a news reporter who is legally recording on a public street would almost certainly meet the criteria for both false imprisonment and civil rights violations under oth California as well as American federal law — provided your detention lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion so according to a wise man okay, here is what you should do as you aggrieved STATE of MIND lawsuit play…
1. False Imprisonment (California State Law)
Elements Required as I Just Checked:
Intentional confinement without consent.
No lawful justification (i.e., no valid arrest or detention).
Resulting Harm to Hour CNN Reputation/ Personal (physical, emotional, and as I said — reputational).
Why It Applies? Reporters recording police in public spaces have explicit rights under their/ CNN this YOUR due to California Penal Code § 409.7(d) which Guarantees media access to disaster scenes/public disturbances and fun addition to that also California Constitution, Art. I § 2(a) which offers far broader free speech protections than the U.S. Constitution ITSELF so handcuffing constitutes "confinement” and is unlawful If you posed no threat, did not interfere with any police action, and identified yourself and ir your fellow mates as press hence your detention was completely unlawful so in edition to California civil lawsuit for damages (all aforementioned and also emotional distress, lost wages, legal fees) hit the LA pigs with “Federal Civil Rights Violation (42 U.S.C. § 1983)” because as “Elements Required”
are self-evident hence action "under color of state law" (e.g., by police) in violation of your constitutional rights (e.g., First Amendment or Fourth Amendment) because first Amendment which in this case inclusive of your recording police in public is protected speech (Glik v. Cunniffe, 1st Cir. 2011) so your detention could be considered retaliatory for exercising this right which is unconstitutional (Fordyce v. City of Seattle, 9th Cir. 2016) and actually as I am out of boredom researching American Enemy Stalker G-Fag Case Law also “Fourth Amendment” is applicable because detention without reasonable suspicion of a crime is an unlawful seizure (Terry v. Ohio, 1968)
and the way I see it the key precedent the case of “Askins v. Dept. of Homeland Security (9th Cir. 2017) during which Court ruled that detaining journalists for recording is unconstitutional absent exigent circumstances and NONE WERE evident from what I see? In addition I should mention that based on what I could see in regards to Federal vs State CA laws, California Civil Rights Abuse (Bane Act, Civil Code § 52.1) is actually stronger than federal claims because it completely prohibits interference with constitutional rights by threats, intimidation, or coercion (e.g., handcuffing you were subjected to by LAPD THUGS!) so CA law allows for punitive damages + attorney fees because by CA law “handcuffing” a compliant reporter is inherently coercive because there is NO valid legal basis for YOUR detention = violation of rights "by force or threat, Aaight?
Critical Factors Strengthening Your Case? I’m a hitchuh with a whole bunch of FACTORS point BLANK so the way you or your counsel should evaluate is “Factor vs Relevance?”
Public Location? Recording in public is unequivocally protected, Press Credentials| Visible/your press badge/camera strengthens "clearly identifiable YOUR journalist" claim SO no Interference if
you maintained distance and didn’t obstruct, LAPeeDicks had no justification! Duration? Even brief handcuffing can constitute false imprisonment so get “Bodycam Footage” which likely disproves officer claims of "interference" or "threat,” or whatever is ass yanked by LApigz who violated you and your rights!
How LAPD officers Might Try to Justify as this is their usual “MO” (and Why It Fails)?
❌ "They interfered with an investigation!" → Must prove actual obstruction (e.g., blocking an arrest). Recording ≠ interference.
❌ "We felt threatened!" → A camera isn’t a weapon. No reasonable officer would fear it (Have Your leaglemEaglemit
Bloodsucking counsel lookup what I glanced in case law Fields v. City of Philadelphia, 3rd Cir. 2017).
❌ "They were in a restricted area!" → On a public street? Invalid unless under lawful emergency closure, was it? Then why the fuck we’re You there bitch? Did CNN Brass want some detainment PR stunt grass? Jus kidding…
If you were completely in the right and aforementioned civil rights violations pidgin asshole tight then actions I recommend you take are as follows:
As stated in the beginning — I just reiterate:
File Complaints with LAPD Internal Affairs + L.A. Police Commission (required before suing) and CA DOJ Civil Rights Division (Online Form) and Demand Bodycam/Dashcam Footage under SB 1421 (45-day deadline which by the way for anyone else is applicable STATEWIDE with any Police Department so assert your rights folks!) and then also sue in Federal Court for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (First/Fourth Amendment violations) and “Bane Act claims (punitive damages)!”
No lawyer born retarded don’t know law shit fuh Jack Shit no problem! Call ACLU SoCal: (213) 977-9500 — or?
First Amendment Coalition: (415) 460-5060
Case Law I looked up and made References here to are:
Glik v. Cunniffe (1st Cir. 2011): Right to record police is protected speech.
Fordyce v. City of Seattle (9th Cir. 2016): Retaliatory detention violates the First Amendment.
Bender v. County of Los Angeles (CA Ct. App. 2013): Bane Act applies to unlawful arrests.
By AmeriKKKan “KKK” originated Laws (Just kidding…), this is a textbook violation so as long as the area you were collared in wasn’t under Emergency prohibition of some kind, if you sue the bastards the city will likely settle to avoid a costly trial.
Milk it!
NEXT ON TO AUSTRALIAN REPORTER who was shot in the leg with a rubber bullet by LAPD Officer as there are criminal, civil, internal, and policy violations arising from this PSYCHO LAPD officer intentionally shooting this Australian reporter with a rubber bullet plus — potential damages and disciplinary actions
against him…
I start with “Criminal Laws Violated” by this PSYCHO LAPD OFFICER so their (California Penal Code) which classifies this as “Assault with a Deadly Weapon” (PC 245(a)(4)) as all the elements are self evident such as Intentionally firing a kinetic impact projectile (rubber bullet) capable of causing great bodily injury so the aggravating factor is that the victim is a bona fide credentialed Australian journalist performing duties (which by the way results in enhanced sentencing under PC 1170.8) as this is textbook case of “Assault Under Color of Authority” (PC 149), (e.g., shooting a non-threatening reporter) so what this essentially is under California Law is a “Criminal Civil Rights Violation” (PC 422.6) because the LAPD’S “PSYCHO OFFICER” was Intentionally interfering with Australian Reporters constitutional rights (press freedom) through “violence.” As such, “Federal Law Violations” (U.S. Code) are “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law” (18 U.S.C. § 242), felony charge, using excessive force violating 1st Amendment (reporting) + 4th Amendment (unreasonable seizure) and as such it requires DOJ prosecution due to “Conspiracy Against Rights” (18 U.S.C. § 241)
If multiple LAPD officers coordinated to obstruct justice or cover up the incident BY THIS PSYCHO LAPD OFFICER..
Civil Lawsuit Violations & Damages Claims POTENTIAL?
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Federal Civil Rights), 1st/4th/14th Amendment violations, Bane Act (CA Civil Code § 52.1), Coercion/threats to intimidate reporter from recording which could be the only reason he fired at her by the way, then also “Assault/Battery” (CA CC § 1708), Intentional harmful contact, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), so while there will also be PAIN AND SUFFERING, what are “Potential Damages?”
| Damage Type | Examples | Estimated Range | |-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------| | Compensatory | Medical bills (surgery/rehab), lost wages, therapy | $250,000 - $1M+ | | Pain & Suffering | Permanent scarring, PTSD, mobility issues | $500,000 - $5M+ | | Punitive | Punish LAPD for reckless conduct (higher if cover-up proven) | $1M - $10M+ | | Injunctive Relief | Court-ordered LAPD policy changes (rubber bullet bans against Journalists with NEW updated journalist protocols) | N/A |
Total Potential Settlement/Judgment: $2M - $15M+ (High profile LIKABLE AUSTRALIAN HOT FEMALE (Hot bootie a plus for male Juror's sympathy + foreign victim = higher jury sympathy)
What I Reviewed?
LAPD Policy Violations (Manual/Special Orders)
Use of Force Policy (Sec. 556)
Rubber bullets prohibited against:
Peaceful protesters/journalists (Policy 556.3).
Non-combative persons (Policy 556.5).
Leg shots are never authorized (Policy 556.8: "Target lower torso only if imminent deadly threat").
Media Interactions (Special Order 7)
Explicit protection for journalists recording in public.
Accountability Failures
Failure to report use of force (Manual Sec. 763).
Dishonesty in incident reports (Manual Sec. 3/723.85).
LAPD’s Internal Disciplinary Measures:
Administrative Investigation
Immediate steps: Officer placed on administrative leave, weapon/badge surrendered.
Board of Rights (BOR) Hearing: 3-person panel (2 LAPD command staff + 1 civilian) decides discipline.
Potential Outcomes
Termination: Likely if intent proven.
Suspension: 22-day max if mitigated.
Training/Probation: Only if policy misinterpretation claimed.
Officer Decertification?
CA POST must revoke certification if felony conviction (SB 2).
*No Lateral Transfer to Another Muni-PD With Pay&Rank Intact in this case — duh!
Key Evidence Needed?
Bodycam/Dashcam Footage (Demand via SB 1421 within 45 days).
LAPD Tactical Plan: Due to protests and riots Officer will easily prove rubber bullets were pre-authorized illegally but aiming at reporters leg and shooting her intentionally still a violation.
Medical Records: Documenting injury severity (rubber bullets do cause fractures and organ damage).
Witnesses: Crew/civilians confirming lack of threat.
Critical Actions for Australian Reporter/Victim?
Criminal Complaint: LAPD IAG + CA DOJ (oag.ca.gov/complaints).
Federal Intervention: DOJ Civil Rights Division (888-736-5551).
Australian Embassy: I would EXERT Pressure via State Department (202-647-4000).
Civil Suit Deadline: File within 2 years (CA statute) or 3 years (federal §1983).
Legal Precedents I Looked Up as Supporting Cases:
Lopez v. City of Los Angeles (9th Cir. 2020): $8M award for rubber bullet injury.
Askins v. DHS (9th Cir. 2017): 1st Amendment protects journalists recording police.
Billington v. City of L.A. (CA Ct. App. 2021): Bane Act applies to less-lethal force.
The FACT of the matter is that this is a felony assault with catastrophic liability for LAPD so I hope this Australian reporter has the presence of mind to Immediately commence and bring forth legal action against LAPD because it is critical to prevent intentional evidence destruction by this PSYCHO LAPD OFFICER FRUITCAKE!
Not a lawyer, never been to fuckin Law School, and didn’t know I needed a lame law Degree to know the fuckin enemy stalker agent laws they piss on the second they hit the streets but luckily in USA a private remedy is available through 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which is a civil rights statute that allows individuals to sue state and local officials for violating their constitutional rights, so assert
Your fuckin rights and never talk to g-fag stalker agent bitches directly but make use of a lawyer as your personal fuckin parrot!
“I POSTED ALL THIS TO SHOW YOU THAT GOVERNMENT POLICE AND AGENT STALKER FAGS AIN’T YOUR FRIENDS AND THAT YOU SHOULD ABSOLUTELY NEVER EVER EVER ANSWER ANY FUCKIN POLICE OR AGENT STALKER QUESTIONS AND THAT EVEN A WORKING REPORTER COULDN’T TALK HIS WAY OUTTUH HANDCUFFS SURE THE FUCK YOU AIN’T EITHER SO NEVER TALK TO POLICE AMD I MEAN FUCKIN EVER NOR ANY G-FAG AGENTS AND I MEAN — FUCKIN EVER CAUSE THAT MAKES YOU WISE AND FUCKIN CLEVER!”
~Stateless Warrior
And that:
“Lurisconsultus licentiatus in California, etsi ingenii acumen humile habeat, longe pluris est quam bellator sine civitate, licet ingeniō praestantissimō (acumen ad 777 aequans) praeditus, cuius consilia iuris prudentiora sunt quam licentiati iurisconsulti.”
~Bellator Sine Civitate
*DISCLAIMER:
Stateless Warrior despite extreme IQ of (REDACTED, I PROMISED TO BE HUMBLE WHILE I RUMBLE SO I DON’T “BIG HEAD SYNDROME” STUMBLE!) is NOT a licensed attorney and does not practice law in the State of California but you are free to seek low IQ’d legal counsel because no federal case is simple unless your IQ is in stratosphere in which case drafting your best legal strategy it is cakewalk!
Never surrender to enemies and keep fighting till you win!
https://www.myvideotime.com/video/263/warrior-s-blaze-stateless-warrior/
Why?
To force them to stop reporting so they can shoot PROTESTERS at random which is just the usual in Los Angeles where the REAL CRIMINALS are NEVER CAUGHT because they HIDE INSIDE CARS emblazoned with POLICE insignia and once they handcuff and shoot reporters nothing will be on video!
I call on Hollywood to STOP GLORIFYING STUPID LAPD PIGS!
But HOW do you get criminals in LA to answer the phone in LA?
Just call 911 — wink, wink!
*Video footage analysis:
I will start with CNN Reporter Mr. Jason FIRST and then after address the FELONY ASSAULT by LAPD officer against Australian Reporter so Mr. Jason who was reporting for CNN was placed in handcuffs to FEAR HIM UP apparently — and then told by LAPD officers who illegally handcuffed him that he will be arrested if he returns. The Australian Reporter I will address after I outline case Mr. Jason has against LAPD — could be seen in physical PAIN after an LAPD officer first looks at her and sees that she is REPORTING for a news channel, aims directly at her — and then fires and hits her in the leg…
So what can you do as a Reporter when LAPD pigz handcuff you unlawfully?
You are soo lucky you are HERE and NOT there or some other stupid site… I’m a GUIDE you like a little fuckin bitch, but you as a Reporter should know all this shit so you must be fuckin stupid?
Are you stupid? Just kidding — stupid ass! Okay then, lemme review their PIGZ R’Us LAPD-FUNKY FUCKIN MONKEY DOKKKUMENTS and I’m a hitchuh cause they might beat’chuh?
Filing a misconduct report against an LAPD officer for unlawfully detaining YOU a CNN journalist requires careful documentation and adherence to their LAPeeDick official channels so according to their LAPD's official procedures and California law which I just checked, your “Critical First Steps” (Within 24-48 Hours) is to
think (no need to be one unless you fancy YERzelf (just coined a new word in Urban English, accreditation please to StatelASS Warrior..) an Officer already in which case I want to remind you that in LA Pigz do fly — in a pig helicopter…) like a LAPD pigglet and “Preserve Evidence’ (I smell a fuckin payday for Pokice. Totality Law$UIT, nice goin bitch!) and for goodne$$$ $$$ake$$$ secure the unedited video footage (from the New York Times reporter who witnessed your unlawful detention, any statements from bystanders, or your CNN bitch ass BITCHIN’ news crew).
Note exact date, time, location, and LAPeeDick officer badge numbers/patrol car numbers, ALL OF IT MOTHER FUCKER, okay? Sorry for my profanity but you are FUCKIN STUPID YOU LAMER! Just kidding… Also gather witness contact info (even from your crew members, and also bystanders) and then lawyer the fuck up and file a Formal Complaint which is pretty easy as LAPD accepts complaints Online so just GOOGLE their LAPD Online Complaint Form URL or RING their filthy asses and whine and bitch to their Internal Affairs DiVISION @ (213) 485-1486
or in Person at any LAPD station or their Police Administration Building (100 W 1st St, LA 90012) which you can easily spot
from a mile away cause all the Pigz will be cumming and goin!
Key Details you must Include as you “State clearly” on and for the fuckin record is the following and I advise you start with "First Amendment Retaliation" which is what it seems to me and then classify your handcuffing which due to being unlawful to me appears to be a "False Arrest" not just to milk Muh dinero outtuh litigious civil route which is almost as straightforward as freeway fucker called “101,” Aaight?
Specify and write using my exact verbiage:
“Reporter was detained while recording news footage on a public street without interfering with police activity in direct violation of Glik v. Cunniffe (1st Circuit, 2011) and California Penal Code § 409.7(d) (right to record police because California State Law allows for recording of pigglets whenever they are INTERacting with you and throwing a fuckin monkey for and perhaps even goin’ Apeshit on ya?).. Reference LAPD Special Order 7 VIOLATION (respecting media access) and bend over so Internal Affairs can see your gaping asshole officer g-fag jackhammered to be the Size of AmeriKan State of Alaska!
Following from their Pig’z of LA Official Monkey-Site…
Parallel Reporting (Essential for Accountability)
Los Angeles Police Commission
File online: Police Commission Complaint
Email: PAC.complaints@lacity.org
Why?: This civilian oversight board investigates officer misconduct independently.
California Department of Justice
Submit to the Civil Rights Enforcement Section: CA DOT Complaint Portal
Cite: Violation of the Bane Act (CA Civil Code § 52.1) and 1st Amendment.
Federal Options
ACLU of Southern California: Report Police Misconduct
U.S. DOJ Civil Rights Division: (800) 253-3931 or DOT Complaint Form
Legal Action
Consult a Civil Rights Attorney
Demand bodycam footage (LAPD Policy: Must release within 45 days per SB 1421).
My Case Law LookUP For Hour Potential lawsuits:
Have your lawyer monkey lookup their AmeriKKKan 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Federal civil rights violation)
also check their State of LAPeeDick Baboonforniuh’s “False imprisonment (CA Penal Code § 236) Statute,” and if you can’t affirms blood suckin lawyer without one having been appointed for you seek “Pro Bono Help” and “Contact National Lawyers Guild” (LA) or “AmeriKKKan First Amendment Coalition.”
My Personal LAPD-Specific Notes You Might Benefit From Knowing?
LAPD Monkey Wannuh Go Apeshit On Ya Retaliation Protection: LAPD prohibits retaliation against complainants (I just checked their LAPD Manual § 3/723.90), but; bare in mind Pigs are Pigs so if you leave LA their buddies are everywhere and you might oddly discover yourself the subject of arbitrary traffic stops wherever you set foot in USA so just BEWARE, okay?
Timeline You’z Lookin At? Their Internal Investigations can take 6-12 months so do request a complaint number for tracking.
If YOU are Stonewalled by LAPeeDick Pighletz I Suggest YOUR ASS: Contact the LA City Controller (213-978-7200) or your City Council member.
Sample Complaint Language I drafted for ya cause I was bored outtuh my fuckin mind, not that I want to help you at all…
"On [Date], Officer [Dipshit’s Badge #] detained [Your Fuckin Name], a credentialed journalist visibly recording with professional equipment, at [Location]. I being a bona-fide Reporter with fake news channel “CNN” identified myself as press while attempting to hit ‘em LAPeeD Pigz for a free pass and stated they were attempting to detain me on public fuckin property. Despite no lawful basis, LA Pee Dick officers applied handcuffs for approximately [State Duration Of Time Soend Assfucked/ I mean Detained in LAPig Cuffs], violating LAPD Special Order 7 and the 1st Amendment. Request: 1) Disciplinary action, 2) Release of all bodycam footage, 3) Policy retraining."
and a million dollars in FUCKIN CA$H for mental anguish, pain, suffering, and PTSD syndrome but I can also take a check made out to CASH so I don’t have to report it to IRS and can leave the last A$$ for “$ABING$” and LAW$UIT CRAVING$!
But while I made you burst with laughter, lemme stop my satire and get serious cause the officer violated you like a mother fucker so how bout you teach them a lawsuit lesson so they never fuck with you again because in California detaining and handcuffing a news reporter who is legally recording on a public street would almost certainly meet the criteria for both false imprisonment and civil rights violations under oth California as well as American federal law — provided your detention lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion so according to a wise man okay, here is what you should do as you aggrieved STATE of MIND lawsuit play…
1. False Imprisonment (California State Law)
Elements Required as I Just Checked:
Intentional confinement without consent.
No lawful justification (i.e., no valid arrest or detention).
Resulting Harm to Hour CNN Reputation/ Personal (physical, emotional, and as I said — reputational).
Why It Applies? Reporters recording police in public spaces have explicit rights under their/ CNN this YOUR due to California Penal Code § 409.7(d) which Guarantees media access to disaster scenes/public disturbances and fun addition to that also California Constitution, Art. I § 2(a) which offers far broader free speech protections than the U.S. Constitution ITSELF so handcuffing constitutes "confinement” and is unlawful If you posed no threat, did not interfere with any police action, and identified yourself and ir your fellow mates as press hence your detention was completely unlawful so in edition to California civil lawsuit for damages (all aforementioned and also emotional distress, lost wages, legal fees) hit the LA pigs with “Federal Civil Rights Violation (42 U.S.C. § 1983)” because as “Elements Required”
are self-evident hence action "under color of state law" (e.g., by police) in violation of your constitutional rights (e.g., First Amendment or Fourth Amendment) because first Amendment which in this case inclusive of your recording police in public is protected speech (Glik v. Cunniffe, 1st Cir. 2011) so your detention could be considered retaliatory for exercising this right which is unconstitutional (Fordyce v. City of Seattle, 9th Cir. 2016) and actually as I am out of boredom researching American Enemy Stalker G-Fag Case Law also “Fourth Amendment” is applicable because detention without reasonable suspicion of a crime is an unlawful seizure (Terry v. Ohio, 1968)
and the way I see it the key precedent the case of “Askins v. Dept. of Homeland Security (9th Cir. 2017) during which Court ruled that detaining journalists for recording is unconstitutional absent exigent circumstances and NONE WERE evident from what I see? In addition I should mention that based on what I could see in regards to Federal vs State CA laws, California Civil Rights Abuse (Bane Act, Civil Code § 52.1) is actually stronger than federal claims because it completely prohibits interference with constitutional rights by threats, intimidation, or coercion (e.g., handcuffing you were subjected to by LAPD THUGS!) so CA law allows for punitive damages + attorney fees because by CA law “handcuffing” a compliant reporter is inherently coercive because there is NO valid legal basis for YOUR detention = violation of rights "by force or threat, Aaight?
Critical Factors Strengthening Your Case? I’m a hitchuh with a whole bunch of FACTORS point BLANK so the way you or your counsel should evaluate is “Factor vs Relevance?”
Public Location? Recording in public is unequivocally protected, Press Credentials| Visible/your press badge/camera strengthens "clearly identifiable YOUR journalist" claim SO no Interference if
you maintained distance and didn’t obstruct, LAPeeDicks had no justification! Duration? Even brief handcuffing can constitute false imprisonment so get “Bodycam Footage” which likely disproves officer claims of "interference" or "threat,” or whatever is ass yanked by LApigz who violated you and your rights!
How LAPD officers Might Try to Justify as this is their usual “MO” (and Why It Fails)?
❌ "They interfered with an investigation!" → Must prove actual obstruction (e.g., blocking an arrest). Recording ≠ interference.
❌ "We felt threatened!" → A camera isn’t a weapon. No reasonable officer would fear it (Have Your leaglemEaglemit
Bloodsucking counsel lookup what I glanced in case law Fields v. City of Philadelphia, 3rd Cir. 2017).
❌ "They were in a restricted area!" → On a public street? Invalid unless under lawful emergency closure, was it? Then why the fuck we’re You there bitch? Did CNN Brass want some detainment PR stunt grass? Jus kidding…
If you were completely in the right and aforementioned civil rights violations pidgin asshole tight then actions I recommend you take are as follows:
As stated in the beginning — I just reiterate:
File Complaints with LAPD Internal Affairs + L.A. Police Commission (required before suing) and CA DOJ Civil Rights Division (Online Form) and Demand Bodycam/Dashcam Footage under SB 1421 (45-day deadline which by the way for anyone else is applicable STATEWIDE with any Police Department so assert your rights folks!) and then also sue in Federal Court for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (First/Fourth Amendment violations) and “Bane Act claims (punitive damages)!”
No lawyer born retarded don’t know law shit fuh Jack Shit no problem! Call ACLU SoCal: (213) 977-9500 — or?
First Amendment Coalition: (415) 460-5060
Case Law I looked up and made References here to are:
Glik v. Cunniffe (1st Cir. 2011): Right to record police is protected speech.
Fordyce v. City of Seattle (9th Cir. 2016): Retaliatory detention violates the First Amendment.
Bender v. County of Los Angeles (CA Ct. App. 2013): Bane Act applies to unlawful arrests.
By AmeriKKKan “KKK” originated Laws (Just kidding…), this is a textbook violation so as long as the area you were collared in wasn’t under Emergency prohibition of some kind, if you sue the bastards the city will likely settle to avoid a costly trial.
Milk it!
NEXT ON TO AUSTRALIAN REPORTER who was shot in the leg with a rubber bullet by LAPD Officer as there are criminal, civil, internal, and policy violations arising from this PSYCHO LAPD officer intentionally shooting this Australian reporter with a rubber bullet plus — potential damages and disciplinary actions
against him…
I start with “Criminal Laws Violated” by this PSYCHO LAPD OFFICER so their (California Penal Code) which classifies this as “Assault with a Deadly Weapon” (PC 245(a)(4)) as all the elements are self evident such as Intentionally firing a kinetic impact projectile (rubber bullet) capable of causing great bodily injury so the aggravating factor is that the victim is a bona fide credentialed Australian journalist performing duties (which by the way results in enhanced sentencing under PC 1170.8) as this is textbook case of “Assault Under Color of Authority” (PC 149), (e.g., shooting a non-threatening reporter) so what this essentially is under California Law is a “Criminal Civil Rights Violation” (PC 422.6) because the LAPD’S “PSYCHO OFFICER” was Intentionally interfering with Australian Reporters constitutional rights (press freedom) through “violence.” As such, “Federal Law Violations” (U.S. Code) are “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law” (18 U.S.C. § 242), felony charge, using excessive force violating 1st Amendment (reporting) + 4th Amendment (unreasonable seizure) and as such it requires DOJ prosecution due to “Conspiracy Against Rights” (18 U.S.C. § 241)
If multiple LAPD officers coordinated to obstruct justice or cover up the incident BY THIS PSYCHO LAPD OFFICER..
Civil Lawsuit Violations & Damages Claims POTENTIAL?
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Federal Civil Rights), 1st/4th/14th Amendment violations, Bane Act (CA Civil Code § 52.1), Coercion/threats to intimidate reporter from recording which could be the only reason he fired at her by the way, then also “Assault/Battery” (CA CC § 1708), Intentional harmful contact, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), so while there will also be PAIN AND SUFFERING, what are “Potential Damages?”
| Damage Type | Examples | Estimated Range | |-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------| | Compensatory | Medical bills (surgery/rehab), lost wages, therapy | $250,000 - $1M+ | | Pain & Suffering | Permanent scarring, PTSD, mobility issues | $500,000 - $5M+ | | Punitive | Punish LAPD for reckless conduct (higher if cover-up proven) | $1M - $10M+ | | Injunctive Relief | Court-ordered LAPD policy changes (rubber bullet bans against Journalists with NEW updated journalist protocols) | N/A |
Total Potential Settlement/Judgment: $2M - $15M+ (High profile LIKABLE AUSTRALIAN HOT FEMALE (Hot bootie a plus for male Juror's sympathy + foreign victim = higher jury sympathy)
What I Reviewed?
LAPD Policy Violations (Manual/Special Orders)
Use of Force Policy (Sec. 556)
Rubber bullets prohibited against:
Peaceful protesters/journalists (Policy 556.3).
Non-combative persons (Policy 556.5).
Leg shots are never authorized (Policy 556.8: "Target lower torso only if imminent deadly threat").
Media Interactions (Special Order 7)
Explicit protection for journalists recording in public.
Accountability Failures
Failure to report use of force (Manual Sec. 763).
Dishonesty in incident reports (Manual Sec. 3/723.85).
LAPD’s Internal Disciplinary Measures:
Administrative Investigation
Immediate steps: Officer placed on administrative leave, weapon/badge surrendered.
Board of Rights (BOR) Hearing: 3-person panel (2 LAPD command staff + 1 civilian) decides discipline.
Potential Outcomes
Termination: Likely if intent proven.
Suspension: 22-day max if mitigated.
Training/Probation: Only if policy misinterpretation claimed.
Officer Decertification?
CA POST must revoke certification if felony conviction (SB 2).
*No Lateral Transfer to Another Muni-PD With Pay&Rank Intact in this case — duh!
Key Evidence Needed?
Bodycam/Dashcam Footage (Demand via SB 1421 within 45 days).
LAPD Tactical Plan: Due to protests and riots Officer will easily prove rubber bullets were pre-authorized illegally but aiming at reporters leg and shooting her intentionally still a violation.
Medical Records: Documenting injury severity (rubber bullets do cause fractures and organ damage).
Witnesses: Crew/civilians confirming lack of threat.
Critical Actions for Australian Reporter/Victim?
Criminal Complaint: LAPD IAG + CA DOJ (oag.ca.gov/complaints).
Federal Intervention: DOJ Civil Rights Division (888-736-5551).
Australian Embassy: I would EXERT Pressure via State Department (202-647-4000).
Civil Suit Deadline: File within 2 years (CA statute) or 3 years (federal §1983).
Legal Precedents I Looked Up as Supporting Cases:
Lopez v. City of Los Angeles (9th Cir. 2020): $8M award for rubber bullet injury.
Askins v. DHS (9th Cir. 2017): 1st Amendment protects journalists recording police.
Billington v. City of L.A. (CA Ct. App. 2021): Bane Act applies to less-lethal force.
The FACT of the matter is that this is a felony assault with catastrophic liability for LAPD so I hope this Australian reporter has the presence of mind to Immediately commence and bring forth legal action against LAPD because it is critical to prevent intentional evidence destruction by this PSYCHO LAPD OFFICER FRUITCAKE!
Not a lawyer, never been to fuckin Law School, and didn’t know I needed a lame law Degree to know the fuckin enemy stalker agent laws they piss on the second they hit the streets but luckily in USA a private remedy is available through 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which is a civil rights statute that allows individuals to sue state and local officials for violating their constitutional rights, so assert
Your fuckin rights and never talk to g-fag stalker agent bitches directly but make use of a lawyer as your personal fuckin parrot!
“I POSTED ALL THIS TO SHOW YOU THAT GOVERNMENT POLICE AND AGENT STALKER FAGS AIN’T YOUR FRIENDS AND THAT YOU SHOULD ABSOLUTELY NEVER EVER EVER ANSWER ANY FUCKIN POLICE OR AGENT STALKER QUESTIONS AND THAT EVEN A WORKING REPORTER COULDN’T TALK HIS WAY OUTTUH HANDCUFFS SURE THE FUCK YOU AIN’T EITHER SO NEVER TALK TO POLICE AMD I MEAN FUCKIN EVER NOR ANY G-FAG AGENTS AND I MEAN — FUCKIN EVER CAUSE THAT MAKES YOU WISE AND FUCKIN CLEVER!”
~Stateless Warrior
And that:
“Lurisconsultus licentiatus in California, etsi ingenii acumen humile habeat, longe pluris est quam bellator sine civitate, licet ingeniō praestantissimō (acumen ad 777 aequans) praeditus, cuius consilia iuris prudentiora sunt quam licentiati iurisconsulti.”
~Bellator Sine Civitate
*DISCLAIMER:
Stateless Warrior despite extreme IQ of (REDACTED, I PROMISED TO BE HUMBLE WHILE I RUMBLE SO I DON’T “BIG HEAD SYNDROME” STUMBLE!) is NOT a licensed attorney and does not practice law in the State of California but you are free to seek low IQ’d legal counsel because no federal case is simple unless your IQ is in stratosphere in which case drafting your best legal strategy it is cakewalk!
Never surrender to enemies and keep fighting till you win!
https://www.myvideotime.com/video/263/warrior-s-blaze-stateless-warrior/
