Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
Does Planet Earth Have INFINITE Shelf Life?
Duration: 0:36
Views: 40
Submitted: 4 weeks ago
Submitted by:
Description:
Unfortunately, NO IT DOES NOT!
Planet Earth’s shelf life is FINITE!
Mathematical science guarantees that to be THE FACT hence human measurement of TIME had a “beginning” and will also have an end this meaning they “TIME” will be — no longer..
In my animation I placed two American astronauts on the moon as the Earth explodes in dogfood chunks… Already, humans have polluted planet Earth’s shelf life soo much that you even if retarded can see that homosapiens are heading g towards EXTINCTION!
Nothing lasts forever but you can say — “whatever…”
Did you just utter a RESOUNDING “NO WAY” to me absolute GOD of Mathematical Science and Physics? You dumb like American government or what? Lol! It goes without saying that estimating the timeline until Earth becomes uninhabitable due to pollution is a complex, multivariate problem that depends on interconnected environmental systems and “human action” and or better yet; “lack thereof,” but if analyse it structurally using key pollutants you can quantify their projected impacts without any issues so all you need really is to identify key pollutants & critical thresholds homosapiens can tolerate -/+ slightly age and EXISTING medical condition dependent like FAT ONESE AMERICAN ASSES cause their heart is PUMPING for like two people EACH (jus kidding..) so greenhouse gases (CO₂, Methane — duh!) so current CO₂ ~420 ppm (vs. pre-industrial 280 ppm) so critical thresholds 1.5°C warming likely breached by 2030–2040 (IPCC) meaning 2°C+ warming as risks irreversible tipping points (e.g., ice sheet collapse, Amazon dieback) and 4°C+ warming will
RESULT (I guarantee!) in widespread uninhabitability due to extreme heat and on top of that in crop failures and extreme water scarcity because at current emissions (~40 Gt CO₂/yr) 2°C by 2050 and 4°C by 2100 with Americanos under Trump for example — business-as-usual scenarios and plastic pollution current rate being 14 million tons/year which “enter” (Think a door stupid ass…) oceans so total ocean plastic ~150 million tons so to quantify marine life lethality determine Threshold as marine ecosystem collapse (e.g., fisheries decline and of KKKourse microplastic toxicity) so you can determine that plastiKKK AmeriKKKan g-fag and other mass in oceans could exceed fish biomass by as early as 2049 — augh my, my, NOTHING WILL BE FINE while air pollution (PM2.5, NOx) at current levels which by the way ONLY 90% of people breathe so as threshold is surpassed will result in chronic respiratory failure & cardiovascular collapse but If PM2.5 concentrations rise 50% by 2100 THEN global life expectancy will easily drop by 2–3 years and did you KNOW that I can pinpoint when you will die based on your current conditions, health habits, and where you reside on planet Earth? But if you thought that was it lemme clue your stupid ass in on chemical contaminants (PFAS, Heavy Metals) so current trend indicates PFAS detected in 99% of humans as soil toxicity is rising even if you are not farming “Jack Shit” you can benefit from knowing this because the threshold crossed equals Irreversible soil infertility & freshwater contamination so that means that critical thresholds in key agricultural regions (e.g., India, China) will be reached by early 2070–2100, auch! Biodiversity loss will be the mother of all bitches here on this one because current rates is 100–1,000x background extinction rate — WHOA — and threshold surPASS means collapse of pollination, pest control, and food webs as jus one likely scenario 40% of insect species endangered meaning ecosystem collapse risks as early as — GET THIS GOOD — 2040–2070!
So would I “mind” to integrate my analysis TIME—Line?
Sure why not so you can estimate when your bastard children will die! Just kidding… Lol! Not funny?
Than STOP POLLUTING THE PLANET BITCH!
( view table in landscape mode stupid faggot!)
| EARTH’s System | Current Status | Threshold Breach | Habitability Impact |
|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Climate Change | Beyond safe zone | 1.5°C (2030s) | Extreme weather, migration crises |
| Biosphere Integrity | High risk | 2040–2060 | Food chain collapse |
| Freshwater Use | Moderate risk | 2050–2070 | Water wars, desertification |
| Novel Entities | High risk (e.g., plastics)| 2040–2060 | Toxicity-driven health crises |
(*I hope you out your SMARTphone in LANDscape you fuckin dumbasses for my table…)
My mathematical approximation assuming linear trends (simplified of course — duh!)… CO₂-Driven Warming: [{Years to 4°C} = \frac{4°C - 1.2°C}{Current rate (0.2°C/decade)} \approx 140 \{ years (2140)}] Next my plastic Ocean saturation formula;[{Years to collapse} = \fract{Fish biomass (1,000 Mt)}{Plastic influx (14 Mt/yr)} \approx 70 \{ years (2090)}] And next my biodiversity collapse formula; [ {Insect extinction rate} = 2.5\%/{year} \implies 100\% { loss by } 2060] , got all that? So what is the net risk here? If you INTERSECT MY timelines LIKE A GOOD DETECTIVE you will safely conclude that there WILL BE destabilization by 2070–2100 as I pointed out earlier so that means regional uninhabitability (e.g., tropics, coasts) even earlier so best case scenario with aggressive mitigation net-zero emissions by 2050 pollution halved by 2040 → Stabilize warming at 1.8°C, extend habitability beyond 2200 but we all know that shit ain’t happening so reality is my worst case (Business-as-Usual as Trump snores and Elon Jacks off…) 4°C by 2100 → meaning easily mass extinction, 1–3 billion climate refugees, systemic collapse but you don’t have to worry too much cause you’ll probably be fuckin DEAD by them anyways and as a matter of fact EVERYONE you met today will likely be deceased in 100 years and rotting six feet under so why worry — right? I mean, that is how the sitting PRESIDENT of USA rationalizes shit — his LIFESPAN which means that without drastic action
planet Earth faces regional uninhabitability (e.g., Middle East Trump just visited probably completely unaware what is coming their Middle Eastern way, South Asia) by 2070–2100 due to combined heat, water scarcity, and food shortages so global collapse WILL follow in subsequent centuries AITHOUT ANY DOUBT, however; humanity’s survival hinges on decarbonization, pollution control, and biodiversity restoration within the next 20–30 years as the click is ticking hence my timeline is not fixed but if strategic global cooperation were to be implemented (200 nations on Earth…) it could avert worst-case outcomes POSTPONE them for a while…
Moreover; Because humans are “VISUAL CREATURES” I resorted to the use of audio visual medium to show absurdity of space colonization with planet Earth falling to absolute polluted shit and furthermore to solidify argument I am making here according to my laser-precise calculations Elon Musk has a mere 1% chance of colonizing Mars in his LIFETIME and 99% of remaining Eartbound hence ONLY MATHEMATICAL RETARDS will argue against preserving planet Earth for themselves as well as subsequent generations to come so DON’T follow American President or their global warming ignoring RATS because this issue is far GREATER than USA will ever be!
“Handle your future wisely…”
~Stateless Warrior
Planet Earth’s shelf life is FINITE!
Mathematical science guarantees that to be THE FACT hence human measurement of TIME had a “beginning” and will also have an end this meaning they “TIME” will be — no longer..
In my animation I placed two American astronauts on the moon as the Earth explodes in dogfood chunks… Already, humans have polluted planet Earth’s shelf life soo much that you even if retarded can see that homosapiens are heading g towards EXTINCTION!
Nothing lasts forever but you can say — “whatever…”
Did you just utter a RESOUNDING “NO WAY” to me absolute GOD of Mathematical Science and Physics? You dumb like American government or what? Lol! It goes without saying that estimating the timeline until Earth becomes uninhabitable due to pollution is a complex, multivariate problem that depends on interconnected environmental systems and “human action” and or better yet; “lack thereof,” but if analyse it structurally using key pollutants you can quantify their projected impacts without any issues so all you need really is to identify key pollutants & critical thresholds homosapiens can tolerate -/+ slightly age and EXISTING medical condition dependent like FAT ONESE AMERICAN ASSES cause their heart is PUMPING for like two people EACH (jus kidding..) so greenhouse gases (CO₂, Methane — duh!) so current CO₂ ~420 ppm (vs. pre-industrial 280 ppm) so critical thresholds 1.5°C warming likely breached by 2030–2040 (IPCC) meaning 2°C+ warming as risks irreversible tipping points (e.g., ice sheet collapse, Amazon dieback) and 4°C+ warming will
RESULT (I guarantee!) in widespread uninhabitability due to extreme heat and on top of that in crop failures and extreme water scarcity because at current emissions (~40 Gt CO₂/yr) 2°C by 2050 and 4°C by 2100 with Americanos under Trump for example — business-as-usual scenarios and plastic pollution current rate being 14 million tons/year which “enter” (Think a door stupid ass…) oceans so total ocean plastic ~150 million tons so to quantify marine life lethality determine Threshold as marine ecosystem collapse (e.g., fisheries decline and of KKKourse microplastic toxicity) so you can determine that plastiKKK AmeriKKKan g-fag and other mass in oceans could exceed fish biomass by as early as 2049 — augh my, my, NOTHING WILL BE FINE while air pollution (PM2.5, NOx) at current levels which by the way ONLY 90% of people breathe so as threshold is surpassed will result in chronic respiratory failure & cardiovascular collapse but If PM2.5 concentrations rise 50% by 2100 THEN global life expectancy will easily drop by 2–3 years and did you KNOW that I can pinpoint when you will die based on your current conditions, health habits, and where you reside on planet Earth? But if you thought that was it lemme clue your stupid ass in on chemical contaminants (PFAS, Heavy Metals) so current trend indicates PFAS detected in 99% of humans as soil toxicity is rising even if you are not farming “Jack Shit” you can benefit from knowing this because the threshold crossed equals Irreversible soil infertility & freshwater contamination so that means that critical thresholds in key agricultural regions (e.g., India, China) will be reached by early 2070–2100, auch! Biodiversity loss will be the mother of all bitches here on this one because current rates is 100–1,000x background extinction rate — WHOA — and threshold surPASS means collapse of pollination, pest control, and food webs as jus one likely scenario 40% of insect species endangered meaning ecosystem collapse risks as early as — GET THIS GOOD — 2040–2070!
So would I “mind” to integrate my analysis TIME—Line?
Sure why not so you can estimate when your bastard children will die! Just kidding… Lol! Not funny?
Than STOP POLLUTING THE PLANET BITCH!
( view table in landscape mode stupid faggot!)
| EARTH’s System | Current Status | Threshold Breach | Habitability Impact |
|---------------------|-------------------------|----------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Climate Change | Beyond safe zone | 1.5°C (2030s) | Extreme weather, migration crises |
| Biosphere Integrity | High risk | 2040–2060 | Food chain collapse |
| Freshwater Use | Moderate risk | 2050–2070 | Water wars, desertification |
| Novel Entities | High risk (e.g., plastics)| 2040–2060 | Toxicity-driven health crises |
(*I hope you out your SMARTphone in LANDscape you fuckin dumbasses for my table…)
My mathematical approximation assuming linear trends (simplified of course — duh!)… CO₂-Driven Warming: [{Years to 4°C} = \frac{4°C - 1.2°C}{Current rate (0.2°C/decade)} \approx 140 \{ years (2140)}] Next my plastic Ocean saturation formula;[{Years to collapse} = \fract{Fish biomass (1,000 Mt)}{Plastic influx (14 Mt/yr)} \approx 70 \{ years (2090)}] And next my biodiversity collapse formula; [ {Insect extinction rate} = 2.5\%/{year} \implies 100\% { loss by } 2060] , got all that? So what is the net risk here? If you INTERSECT MY timelines LIKE A GOOD DETECTIVE you will safely conclude that there WILL BE destabilization by 2070–2100 as I pointed out earlier so that means regional uninhabitability (e.g., tropics, coasts) even earlier so best case scenario with aggressive mitigation net-zero emissions by 2050 pollution halved by 2040 → Stabilize warming at 1.8°C, extend habitability beyond 2200 but we all know that shit ain’t happening so reality is my worst case (Business-as-Usual as Trump snores and Elon Jacks off…) 4°C by 2100 → meaning easily mass extinction, 1–3 billion climate refugees, systemic collapse but you don’t have to worry too much cause you’ll probably be fuckin DEAD by them anyways and as a matter of fact EVERYONE you met today will likely be deceased in 100 years and rotting six feet under so why worry — right? I mean, that is how the sitting PRESIDENT of USA rationalizes shit — his LIFESPAN which means that without drastic action
planet Earth faces regional uninhabitability (e.g., Middle East Trump just visited probably completely unaware what is coming their Middle Eastern way, South Asia) by 2070–2100 due to combined heat, water scarcity, and food shortages so global collapse WILL follow in subsequent centuries AITHOUT ANY DOUBT, however; humanity’s survival hinges on decarbonization, pollution control, and biodiversity restoration within the next 20–30 years as the click is ticking hence my timeline is not fixed but if strategic global cooperation were to be implemented (200 nations on Earth…) it could avert worst-case outcomes POSTPONE them for a while…
Moreover; Because humans are “VISUAL CREATURES” I resorted to the use of audio visual medium to show absurdity of space colonization with planet Earth falling to absolute polluted shit and furthermore to solidify argument I am making here according to my laser-precise calculations Elon Musk has a mere 1% chance of colonizing Mars in his LIFETIME and 99% of remaining Eartbound hence ONLY MATHEMATICAL RETARDS will argue against preserving planet Earth for themselves as well as subsequent generations to come so DON’T follow American President or their global warming ignoring RATS because this issue is far GREATER than USA will ever be!
“Handle your future wisely…”
~Stateless Warrior
Categories:
People and Blogs
