Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
How To Protect Yourself From FBI, DEA, NAVY, Police Micorwave Weaoons
Duration: 0:26
Views: 19
Submitted: 1 week ago
Submitted by:
Description:
“How to Defeat AMERICAN, Russian, and Chinese Microwave Weapons For Fuckin Dummies 101”
Because American Agents tortured me with them for
24 hours STRAIGHT during Easter of this year (2025) , because idiots do not know that I engineered my first microwave weapon in 2004 but don’t waste time with it albeit I always have one nearby for contingencies as I only engineer lasers for personal defence, I will abstain from teaching you how to build microwave energy weapons, it will show you how to Defeat Microwave Weapons!
Facts?
Always good to start there to avoid government FBI Agent terrorist DEW torturing bullshit..
• Interest in ELRAD Devices? Recent protests raised concerns about injuries possibly caused by Long-Range Acoustic Devices (ELRAD).
• Injury Analysis? Reported injuries (facial swelling, burns) were actually inconsistent with ELRAD effects and indicate possible microwave weapon usage same as government agents used on me to torture me for 24 hours straight.
• Military Microwave Systems? Various military contractors design microwave systems for area denial, specifically for controlling unarmed civilians but if you can control them with it you can torture them as well… Think of it as American, Chinese, and (they all use them against each others embassy staffers by the way but in USA FBI, DEA, NAVY, even fuckin LAP FUCKIN “D” will rig a prisoners seating area to target particular inmates during transport — no shit! )Russian Government’s discipline rods which they deploy to punish your posts on my video sharing site.. True, but only one example.. Out of million others because American officers and agents love the fact that nothing can be proven afterwards because only your face might swell depending on intensity and duration, lips be burned slightly..
• Microwave Interaction: Microwaves primarily interact with water molecules, causing heating due to molecular friction.
So What Are The Key Concepts?
• ELRAD (Long-Range Acoustic Device):
• Acoustic device targeting the ear with loud sounds; not capable of causing burns or skin injuries.
• Microwave Weapons:
• American engineered by Raytheon Operate at higher frequencies (80-120 GHz) than kitchen microwaves (2.5 GHz).
• High frequencies allow energy to be focused in the outer layers of skin, causing pain with minimal energy.
• Electromagnetic Radiation:
• Consists of photons and an electric field by the way.
• Water molecules (dipoles) interact with microwaves, leading to heating.
How Microwaves Work?
• Heating Mechanism?
• Lower frequency microwaves penetrate deeply, while higher frequency microwaves deposit energy in the outer millimeter of tissue for pain/injury.
• Optics and Focusing?
• Higher frequencies allow better collimation and distance targeting due to shorter wavelengths.
Defense Mechanisms Against American (FBI/ Pokice/ NAVY FAGS) Microwave Attacks?
1. Water Absorption!
• Using wet towels or water bottles can block American Agnt, Officer, NAVY FAG high-powered microwave radiation effectively.
• Example:? A damp towel reduced the microwave’s effective range significantly.
2. How Bout “Metal Reflection?”
• Conductive materials reflect microwaves.
• Example: A thin sheet of metal blocks microwaves effectively and prevents the American Gestapo from torturing you… Same for Chinese and Russian police and their Gestapo..
3. Perforated Conductors?
• Using a perforated metal screen allows visibility while protecting from microwaves.
• Example: A laminated poster with aluminum foil blocked microwaves while it remains transparent.
Stateless Warrior’s Key Takeaways For You?
• Microwave Weapons:
• Not effective against heavily armed targets but pose a risk to unarmed civilians.
• Practical Defense:
• Keeping wet materials or reflective metals could provide basic protection against American Gestapo’s microwave attacks.
• Personal Safety:
• Knowledge of these systems and potential defense mechanisms can be critical in protest situations or other scenarios involving microwave weapons where American Gestapo Agents will rig your vehicle and apartment/house with miniaturized version similar in size as two iPhones 16 pro’s placed against each other side by side!
Important Terms You Should Know?
• Microwave Frequency: Electromagnetic radiation frequency between 300 MHz and 300 GHz; used in cooking and weapon systems. Get it? Government agent Gestapo fags of USA, China and Russia use them to literally COOK YOU! And they AGE YOUR BRAIN if they target your fuckin head by twenty years easy!
• Cavity Magnetron: A vacuum tube that generates microwaves in microwave ovens.
• Waveguide: A structure that directs microwave radiation from the magnetron to the cooking area.
RECAP; How to protect yourself against American Gestapo fascist government agent and officer torture?
• Use wet towels to block microwaves and observing the reduction in fluorescent tube illumination.
• Use metal sheets to reflect microwaves, effectively blocking their energy.
• I Highlighted the effectiveness of laminated aluminum foil screens in providing visual protection while blocking Gestapo radiation.
And you want to know even more?
I you want to experiment, you should know the following;
• Safety Concerns FIRST (Not part of OSHA :-)) High-powered microwaves are dangerous; they can cause harm unlike low-powered microwaves (e.g., from cell phones for example which also can be weaponized by removing a vibrator and wiring your explosives for remote detonation from another part of the World but highly illegal so don’t do it….
• Microwave Testing? Demonstration of various materials to block or detect microwave radiation? Red on I will reveal
It to you..
• Conductivity and Protection? Only electrically conductive materials can effectively block microwaves.
• Microwave Radiation? High-frequency radiation that can be harmful at high power levels.
• Cavity Magnetron: A device that generates microwaves; can be dangerous if mishandled.
• Voltage Safety: Microwaves can involve high voltages (up to 4,000 volts) that are potentially lethal so just because I am very comfortable don’t mean you should play with this shit unless you really know what you are doing and worth a mention that I routinely weaponized electricity and use it for self defence..
• Attenuation: The reduction of the intensity of the microwave beam through absorption by materials.
• Electromagnetic Radiation: Waves of the electromagnetic field, propagating through space, including microwaves.
• Polar Molecule? A molecule with a distribution of charge leading to partially positive and negative ends (e.g., water).
• Faraday Cage: An enclosure designed to block electromagnetic fields by using conductive materials.
Materials I Tested Against American Gestapo Government Micriwave Torturers;
• Plywood: Does not block microwaves effectively due to low water content.
• Fiberglass: Strong but ineffective against microwaves.
• Carbon Fiber: Conductive; reflects microwaves effectively.
• Graphite Film: Conductive and effective in reflecting microwaves.
• Aluminized Foam Insulation: Effective for building a barrier against microwaves. Not regular but aluminized!
• Emergency Blankets: Thin and portable; effective when coated with aluminum.
• Conductive Cloth: Sewable and robust; can be made into garments for protection.
• Testing with Materials:
• Plywood and fiberglass do not block microwaves.
• Carbon fiber and aluminized foam are effective at blocking microwaves.
• My Detection Methods Revealed First Time Ever!
• Neon Bulbs: Inuse them to detect string microwave fields; respond based on polarity.
• Field Strength Meter; Measures intensity of microwave radiation. Cheap on Amazon…
• IR Thermometer: Detects heat emitted by microwaves, indicating their presence another words.. Also Cheap on Amazon…
Of course they all claim such weapons don’t exist while Raytheon is MASS PRODUCING THEM so I think most of the 20,000 Police Agencies will get them sooner or later!
Hey, are you their target?
How do you know?
When DEW-Terrorizing FBI fags bug your vehicle, dwelling, you know what’s up and what is down — duh!
Still don’t believe high-powered energy weapons exist?
Hey, how would you like I temporarily blind you (will not cause you permanent blindness I swear…) with my homemade “Laser Dazzler?”
And I can with microwaves even induce a Heart Attack it I’m not here to whack you — as long as you FUCK OFF after you read this post..
Get FUCKIN LOST NOW!
Still NO?
You want to know if ENERGY WEAPONS are REAL?
Okay…
Walk up to a POLICE OFFICER and six inches from his face shout the following words as loud as you can; “FUCK YOUR MOTHER BITCH!”
Okay, then the Police Officer will follow one of American 20,000 Police Agencies protocols which will be to TAZE YOUR ASS! Taser is a form of an energy weapon, but lets take it further.. Say that Americans are your enemies and or; that you are a commercial developer and want to force Hawaii Natives to flee so you can buy their land for fuckin peanuts…
I’m just talking bullshit despite being the God of both Physics and Mathematics though in life I pretend to be an idiot for the time being. So say you are a Chinese God of Engineering and want to covertly target their island of Hawaii or use priormscenario of a land grabber who has access to SPACE — not Elon of course; “Elon is moving all his entities to Texas where he will I’m sure even build a town bearing his name but, how would you target anyplace on Earth from Soace with lasers?
How bout constantly setting your enemy on fire from Soace without a single shred of evidence and I am talking not Arson here of which the first example would qualify as, but Nation igniting Nation to get even or punish them, cause havoc, you name it.. Is that possible?
Nobody thought of it until now but what if I show you how to design a laser capable of igniting dry grass in Hawaii due to their invasive African grass species such as “fountain grass” (That’s Pennisetum setaceum my bitches..) and “guinea grass*”(Megathyrsus maximus weaponized up their rectimus from Space…). These grasses grow rapidly easily outcompeting native plants of Hawaii, dry out quickly during Hawaii’s dry seasons, becoming highly flammable so basically I will weaponize
it from Space to turn it into my matchbox to create a weaponized continuous fuel beds that allow wildfires to spread rapidly and I grin like a Psycho in Beijing with my home brewed and engineered Space Lasers — WHOA!
So to do that first you have to understanding the physics of combustion, energy transfer, and practical engineering constraints. Dig? No? Lemme break it down and I will start with hypothetical but accurate project requirements and will include energy calculations in detail (but don’t
build one to target humans unless you are mental as this is just to show what is possible in Space engineering environs, dig?), along with all technical specifications..
So WHAT would “BE” the Basic Physics of Igniting Dry Grass anywhere in Earth? Ignition Temperature of course because grass typically ignites at ~300°C (572°F) if I am not mistaking? Sorry, it an arsonist so going off my vast knowledge not verified on this one.. “Energy Requirement? “The laser must deliver enough energy to heat a small volume of grass to this temperature, overcoming heat loss from conduction, convection, and radiation. So that STATED, what are the “Key Variables?”
“Mass of Grass” of Course.. I assumed here an enemy target area of 1 cm² (0.01 m²) with a mass of ~0.1 grams (dry grass density being ~0.1 g/cm³). “Specific Heat Capacity?” Dry grass (cellulose) has ~1.3 J/g°C. And that brings us to “Temperature Rise (ΔT) From ambient (~25°C) to ignition (~300°C): ΔT = 275°C.. Easy peasy let’s get Space to Earth target igniting busy!
And now I will reveal to you my “Energy Calculation” but don’t show it to any government cause they might want to build a weapon like this [Q = m \cdot C \cdot \Delta T = 0.1 \, \{g} \cdot 1.3 \, \{J/g°C} \cdot 275 \, \{°C} = 35.75 \, {J}] so THIS is the minimum theoretical energy required, ignoring heat loss of course but in reality 10–100× more energy may be needed due to inefficiencies (e.g., airflow cooling the target and yes I thought of everything as usual). So WHAT Would Be MY Practical Estimate? ~350–3,500 J (0.35–3.5 kJ) per ignition.
WHAT Would BE My Laser Specifications? Well, to ignite grass, the laser must deliver energy rapidly enough to overcome heat dissipation so here are my “Critical Parameters;”
1. Wavelength?
- Optimal: 808 nm (near-infrared by the way) or 10.6 µm (CO₂ laser).
- Quick sidenote warranted and that is the fact that grass absorbs infrared light well while visible wavelengths (e.g., 532 nm) may reflect.
2. Power? (Continuous Wave or Pulsed) with Continuous Wave (CW) sustained power to maintain temperature.
- What ABOUT Pulsed? High peak power in short bursts (e.g., nanoseconds).
3. TARGET Spot Size IN Hawaii? Focused to 1–10 mm² for maximum energy density.
4. What About Atmospheric Loss?
- Absorption/scattering by air, humidity, or dust reduces efficiency (~10–50% loss over 1 km).
My Example Design;
| Parameter | Value |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
| Wavelength | 808 nm (near-infrared) |
| Power | 500 W (CW) or 10 kW pulsed|
| Pulse Duration | 1–10 seconds (CW) or 1–10 ns (pulsed) |
| Energy per Ignition | 500–5,000 J |
| Beam Divergence | < 1 mrad (to maintain focus over distance) |
What Would Be Some Engineering Challenges?
Laser — Duh — so sufficient Power Source which could be portable Nuclear….
- A 500 W laser for example would require ~1,500 W of electrical input (efficiency ~30%).
- Battery or capacitor storage for portable systems is bulky (e.g., car battery-sized)so Portable Nuclear Fuel Cell of sorts would deliver best results and even a 1000 year shelf life of unit and worth a mention here is that if Americans were to build it Department of Energy regulates Nuclear if I am not mistaking so this would be a multi agency project and Americans g-fags can’t keep secrets for shit but always Kiss and Tell but China Commies know how to keep their kiths shut real good and we are such good friends I will can my next dog Shanghai!
Now back to “Thermal Management” you have to laser-focus on because lasers generate heat; active cooling (e.g., water or thermoelectric) in this case would be essential. And what about “Optics?” That’s CAKEWALK! High-quality lenses/mirrors to focus the beam and minimize divergence. And “Safety Systems?”
Fail-safes to prevent accidental firing or overheating? We don’t want to engineer an autonomous incinerator called TESLA which despite fire risks lacks fire suppression system if any kind so owner after owner gets barbecued when T-boned!
So I will reveal now real “Comparison to Existing Lasers” to show feasability so that huh know I ain’t beating a dead horsey in Texas like Elon and telling him to GET UP! I’ll start with “Industrial Cutting Lasers” so CO₂ lasers (1–10 kW) can cut metal but are stationary and require heavy cooling while “Military Lasers”
such as Americano Navy FAGS LaWS (30–100 kW) can disable drones but are large and power-hungry bastards like Donald Geezer Gump! What about “Handheld Lasers?” Consumer lasers are limited to < 5 W (Class 4) due to safety regulations I think if I am not mistaking and this may vary country by country but since our theoretical Space Laser is de facto military use there would be nos such issues unless the nation developing it is a signatory to a treaty which governs space lasers in which case shit outtuh luck for the bastards..
Now How Feasible Would THIS FREAQIN BE? Ground-Based? Possible with a 500 W–1 kW laser system (size of a small car by the way), but impractical for covert use cause all your enemies would be asking, hey; “what the fuck is that?”
“Space-Based?” Feasible once you overcome atmospheric distortion, power limitations, and the immense cost of launching lasers into orbit but as mother ships get bigger that will be a non-issue as long as a laser capable of igniting dry grass has ~350–3,500 J of energy, delivered via a 500 W–10 kW infrared or CO₂ laser system.
So, within a realm of possibility without any issues!
Now why would any nation on planet Earth possibly want a weapon grade laser targeting system in Space?
I am going to reveal to YOU how you can defeat all Russian, Chinese and American nukes if you engineer an elaborate AI powered cutting edge laser weapons system in space which covers the FOOTPRINT of all three nations I just mentioned two of which are playing Poker against the third who is a sucker so China and Russia against USA of course and I will do so with a detailed comparison of the speed at which lasers (directed-energy weapons) and conventional missile systems can engage targets on Earth. My analysis covers the physics of engagement, along with practical limitations, amd I will also to solidify my argument briefly cover real-world examples from various countries with zero fiction all reality!
To get to the very bottom of conventional weapons versus lasers comparison Inwillnstart with “Speed Definitions…” Laser speed? Travels at the speed of light (~300,000 km/s in a vacuum) and if
You want to get a glimpse in total darkens flick a light switch to get a visual grasp on what the speed of light is, wow! Now, how about Missile speed? Varies by type of course and all got a wide gamut in their arsenal Americans and Russians are leaders in this segment of warfare so subsonic, supersonic, hypersonic — confused yet? Not to worry, I’ll break the speed down mathematically for you… Modern missiles range from Mach 0.8** (~0.27 km/s) to Mach 25+ (~8.6 km/s) and I’m a hitchuh with my Direct Speed Comparison table:
| Sys-Type|Speed|Time2Hit 100 km Trgt |&2Hit 1,000 km Target|
|-----------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Laser (Speed of Light) | ~300,000 km/s | 0.00033 seconds | 0.0033 seconds |
| Hypersonic Missile (Mach 10, ~3.4 km/s) | ~3.4 km/s | ~29 seconds | ~294 seconds (4.9 minutes) |
| Ballistic Missile (Mach 20, ~6.8 km/s) | ~6.8 km/s | ~14.7 seconds | ~147 seconds (2.45 minutes) |
| Cruise Missile (Mach 0.8, ~0.27 km/s) | ~0.27 km/s | ~370 seconds (6.2 minutes) | ~3,700 seconds (61.6 minutes) |
So What Are The Key Factors Affecting Engagement Time?
I’ll start with Lasers…
Pros?
- Instantaneous hit: No travel time once fired (speed of light WOW).
- Precision? Can adjust aim dynamically.
- Cons?
- Line-of-sight required… Also limited by Earth’s curvature (~500 km max range for ground-based lasers) but an elaborate system can overcome these issues as it could be both ground and Space based which will inadvertently and or INTENTIONALLY make it extremely robust..
- Dwell time? Requires sustained focus (1–10 seconds) to deliver enough energy to destroy a target.
- Atmospheric interference Affecting My Laser Baby Weapon? Clouds, rain, or dust scatter laser energy.
What about freakin Missiles?
- Pros?
- Global reach.. Intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM’s) can strike anywhere on Earth.
- Kinetic impact? Delivers explosive payload.
- Cons?
- Travel time? Minutes to hours, depending on distance
so lasers beat this clunker weapons system with ease!
- Interceptability? Vulnerable to anti-missile systems (e.g., American THAAD, or Israeli Iron Dome).
Any Real-World Examples of weaponized “Laser Systems?”
1. Navy fag LaWS (Laser Weapon System cause they didn’t want to surrender to Iranians again in their knees..
- Power: 30–150 kW.
- Range: ~1–10 km (anti-drone, anti-small boat).
- Engagement time: 2–5 seconds of dwell time to disable a target.
2. Israel’s Iron Beam?
- Power: 100 kW.
- Range: ~7 km (air defense).
Next I Globe Hop 2Eval Missile Systems…
Hypersonic Missiles?
- Russian Avangard (Mach 20+): Glide vehicle for ICBM’s.
- Chinese DF-17: Mach 5–10 hypersonic glide vehicle.
Ballistic Missiles?
- U.S. Minuteman III (ICBM): Mach 23 (~7 km/s).
Cruise Missiles?
- Tomahawk (U.S.): Mach 0.8 (~0.27 km/s).
- BrahMos (India/Russia): Mach 3 (~1 km/s).
How Bout I Hitchuh With Hypothetical Scenario-Based Comparison?
Short-Range Engagement (10 km)?
- Laser: Hits instantly but requires ~5 seconds to burn through a drone.
- Missile?A short-range SAM (e.g., NASAMS) traveling at Mach 4 (~1.36 km/s) would take ~7.3 seconds.
Now a Long-Range Strike (1,000 km)?
- Laser? Impossible (curvature of Earth limits ground-based lasers).
- Ballistic Missile? ~147 seconds (Mach 20).
- And Hypersonic Glide Vehicle? ~147–294 seconds (Mach 10–20).
What About My Space-Based Lasers (Theoretical of course)?
- Speed? Still light-speed, but atmospheric distortion reduces effectiveness.
- Range? Limited by orbital mechanics (e.g., low Earth orbit satellites move at ~7.8 km/s).
So What Would Be Strategic Implications?
Lemme Outline ‘Em Below…
| Aspect | Lasers | Missiles |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Speed Advantage | Instantaneous hit
| Slow relative to lasers |
| Countermeasures | Hard to evade | Decoys, jamming, anti-missile systems |
| Cost per Shot | ~$1–10 (electricity) | $1M–$20M (e.g., Patriot missile) |
| Defensive Use | Ideal for intercepting missiles/drones | Offensive or defensive |
Any Limitations? (You want to know your weapons weaknesses to mitigate issues when engineering which is what Indo with my energy weapons and lasers and any robots I weaponize and drop as sleeper agents for burglars at one of the properties I acquired for example where one of my robots will snap a human spine when powered outside of geo fenced property boundaries…
- Lasers?
- Power requirements scale exponentially with range.
- Ineffective against hardened or fast-moving targets (e.g., ICBM’s) for now but a solution can be engineered to overcome this issue ie, simultaneous Ai targeting and higher power…
- Missiles?
- Launch detection gives defenders time to react.
- Expensive and logistically complex.
Lasers cannot be matched in speed but I think for now until laser weapons technology evolves into Soace the last frontier by the way for mankind, future conflicts will be for the time being be limited to hybrid systems (e.g., lasers for defense + missiles for offense) will likely dominate I think. For now however; no technology surpasses the raw speed of light, but practical challenges keep lasers niche compared to conventional missiles.
In warfare on battlefield, striking at the speed of LIGHT gives one unprecedented advantage over any enemy force and that is why lasers are the future of warfare both in Space and in Earth…
Because American Agents tortured me with them for
24 hours STRAIGHT during Easter of this year (2025) , because idiots do not know that I engineered my first microwave weapon in 2004 but don’t waste time with it albeit I always have one nearby for contingencies as I only engineer lasers for personal defence, I will abstain from teaching you how to build microwave energy weapons, it will show you how to Defeat Microwave Weapons!
Facts?
Always good to start there to avoid government FBI Agent terrorist DEW torturing bullshit..
• Interest in ELRAD Devices? Recent protests raised concerns about injuries possibly caused by Long-Range Acoustic Devices (ELRAD).
• Injury Analysis? Reported injuries (facial swelling, burns) were actually inconsistent with ELRAD effects and indicate possible microwave weapon usage same as government agents used on me to torture me for 24 hours straight.
• Military Microwave Systems? Various military contractors design microwave systems for area denial, specifically for controlling unarmed civilians but if you can control them with it you can torture them as well… Think of it as American, Chinese, and (they all use them against each others embassy staffers by the way but in USA FBI, DEA, NAVY, even fuckin LAP FUCKIN “D” will rig a prisoners seating area to target particular inmates during transport — no shit! )Russian Government’s discipline rods which they deploy to punish your posts on my video sharing site.. True, but only one example.. Out of million others because American officers and agents love the fact that nothing can be proven afterwards because only your face might swell depending on intensity and duration, lips be burned slightly..
• Microwave Interaction: Microwaves primarily interact with water molecules, causing heating due to molecular friction.
So What Are The Key Concepts?
• ELRAD (Long-Range Acoustic Device):
• Acoustic device targeting the ear with loud sounds; not capable of causing burns or skin injuries.
• Microwave Weapons:
• American engineered by Raytheon Operate at higher frequencies (80-120 GHz) than kitchen microwaves (2.5 GHz).
• High frequencies allow energy to be focused in the outer layers of skin, causing pain with minimal energy.
• Electromagnetic Radiation:
• Consists of photons and an electric field by the way.
• Water molecules (dipoles) interact with microwaves, leading to heating.
How Microwaves Work?
• Heating Mechanism?
• Lower frequency microwaves penetrate deeply, while higher frequency microwaves deposit energy in the outer millimeter of tissue for pain/injury.
• Optics and Focusing?
• Higher frequencies allow better collimation and distance targeting due to shorter wavelengths.
Defense Mechanisms Against American (FBI/ Pokice/ NAVY FAGS) Microwave Attacks?
1. Water Absorption!
• Using wet towels or water bottles can block American Agnt, Officer, NAVY FAG high-powered microwave radiation effectively.
• Example:? A damp towel reduced the microwave’s effective range significantly.
2. How Bout “Metal Reflection?”
• Conductive materials reflect microwaves.
• Example: A thin sheet of metal blocks microwaves effectively and prevents the American Gestapo from torturing you… Same for Chinese and Russian police and their Gestapo..
3. Perforated Conductors?
• Using a perforated metal screen allows visibility while protecting from microwaves.
• Example: A laminated poster with aluminum foil blocked microwaves while it remains transparent.
Stateless Warrior’s Key Takeaways For You?
• Microwave Weapons:
• Not effective against heavily armed targets but pose a risk to unarmed civilians.
• Practical Defense:
• Keeping wet materials or reflective metals could provide basic protection against American Gestapo’s microwave attacks.
• Personal Safety:
• Knowledge of these systems and potential defense mechanisms can be critical in protest situations or other scenarios involving microwave weapons where American Gestapo Agents will rig your vehicle and apartment/house with miniaturized version similar in size as two iPhones 16 pro’s placed against each other side by side!
Important Terms You Should Know?
• Microwave Frequency: Electromagnetic radiation frequency between 300 MHz and 300 GHz; used in cooking and weapon systems. Get it? Government agent Gestapo fags of USA, China and Russia use them to literally COOK YOU! And they AGE YOUR BRAIN if they target your fuckin head by twenty years easy!
• Cavity Magnetron: A vacuum tube that generates microwaves in microwave ovens.
• Waveguide: A structure that directs microwave radiation from the magnetron to the cooking area.
RECAP; How to protect yourself against American Gestapo fascist government agent and officer torture?
• Use wet towels to block microwaves and observing the reduction in fluorescent tube illumination.
• Use metal sheets to reflect microwaves, effectively blocking their energy.
• I Highlighted the effectiveness of laminated aluminum foil screens in providing visual protection while blocking Gestapo radiation.
And you want to know even more?
I you want to experiment, you should know the following;
• Safety Concerns FIRST (Not part of OSHA :-)) High-powered microwaves are dangerous; they can cause harm unlike low-powered microwaves (e.g., from cell phones for example which also can be weaponized by removing a vibrator and wiring your explosives for remote detonation from another part of the World but highly illegal so don’t do it….
• Microwave Testing? Demonstration of various materials to block or detect microwave radiation? Red on I will reveal
It to you..
• Conductivity and Protection? Only electrically conductive materials can effectively block microwaves.
• Microwave Radiation? High-frequency radiation that can be harmful at high power levels.
• Cavity Magnetron: A device that generates microwaves; can be dangerous if mishandled.
• Voltage Safety: Microwaves can involve high voltages (up to 4,000 volts) that are potentially lethal so just because I am very comfortable don’t mean you should play with this shit unless you really know what you are doing and worth a mention that I routinely weaponized electricity and use it for self defence..
• Attenuation: The reduction of the intensity of the microwave beam through absorption by materials.
• Electromagnetic Radiation: Waves of the electromagnetic field, propagating through space, including microwaves.
• Polar Molecule? A molecule with a distribution of charge leading to partially positive and negative ends (e.g., water).
• Faraday Cage: An enclosure designed to block electromagnetic fields by using conductive materials.
Materials I Tested Against American Gestapo Government Micriwave Torturers;
• Plywood: Does not block microwaves effectively due to low water content.
• Fiberglass: Strong but ineffective against microwaves.
• Carbon Fiber: Conductive; reflects microwaves effectively.
• Graphite Film: Conductive and effective in reflecting microwaves.
• Aluminized Foam Insulation: Effective for building a barrier against microwaves. Not regular but aluminized!
• Emergency Blankets: Thin and portable; effective when coated with aluminum.
• Conductive Cloth: Sewable and robust; can be made into garments for protection.
• Testing with Materials:
• Plywood and fiberglass do not block microwaves.
• Carbon fiber and aluminized foam are effective at blocking microwaves.
• My Detection Methods Revealed First Time Ever!
• Neon Bulbs: Inuse them to detect string microwave fields; respond based on polarity.
• Field Strength Meter; Measures intensity of microwave radiation. Cheap on Amazon…
• IR Thermometer: Detects heat emitted by microwaves, indicating their presence another words.. Also Cheap on Amazon…
Of course they all claim such weapons don’t exist while Raytheon is MASS PRODUCING THEM so I think most of the 20,000 Police Agencies will get them sooner or later!
Hey, are you their target?
How do you know?
When DEW-Terrorizing FBI fags bug your vehicle, dwelling, you know what’s up and what is down — duh!
Still don’t believe high-powered energy weapons exist?
Hey, how would you like I temporarily blind you (will not cause you permanent blindness I swear…) with my homemade “Laser Dazzler?”
And I can with microwaves even induce a Heart Attack it I’m not here to whack you — as long as you FUCK OFF after you read this post..
Get FUCKIN LOST NOW!
Still NO?
You want to know if ENERGY WEAPONS are REAL?
Okay…
Walk up to a POLICE OFFICER and six inches from his face shout the following words as loud as you can; “FUCK YOUR MOTHER BITCH!”
Okay, then the Police Officer will follow one of American 20,000 Police Agencies protocols which will be to TAZE YOUR ASS! Taser is a form of an energy weapon, but lets take it further.. Say that Americans are your enemies and or; that you are a commercial developer and want to force Hawaii Natives to flee so you can buy their land for fuckin peanuts…
I’m just talking bullshit despite being the God of both Physics and Mathematics though in life I pretend to be an idiot for the time being. So say you are a Chinese God of Engineering and want to covertly target their island of Hawaii or use priormscenario of a land grabber who has access to SPACE — not Elon of course; “Elon is moving all his entities to Texas where he will I’m sure even build a town bearing his name but, how would you target anyplace on Earth from Soace with lasers?
How bout constantly setting your enemy on fire from Soace without a single shred of evidence and I am talking not Arson here of which the first example would qualify as, but Nation igniting Nation to get even or punish them, cause havoc, you name it.. Is that possible?
Nobody thought of it until now but what if I show you how to design a laser capable of igniting dry grass in Hawaii due to their invasive African grass species such as “fountain grass” (That’s Pennisetum setaceum my bitches..) and “guinea grass*”(Megathyrsus maximus weaponized up their rectimus from Space…). These grasses grow rapidly easily outcompeting native plants of Hawaii, dry out quickly during Hawaii’s dry seasons, becoming highly flammable so basically I will weaponize
it from Space to turn it into my matchbox to create a weaponized continuous fuel beds that allow wildfires to spread rapidly and I grin like a Psycho in Beijing with my home brewed and engineered Space Lasers — WHOA!
So to do that first you have to understanding the physics of combustion, energy transfer, and practical engineering constraints. Dig? No? Lemme break it down and I will start with hypothetical but accurate project requirements and will include energy calculations in detail (but don’t
build one to target humans unless you are mental as this is just to show what is possible in Space engineering environs, dig?), along with all technical specifications..
So WHAT would “BE” the Basic Physics of Igniting Dry Grass anywhere in Earth? Ignition Temperature of course because grass typically ignites at ~300°C (572°F) if I am not mistaking? Sorry, it an arsonist so going off my vast knowledge not verified on this one.. “Energy Requirement? “The laser must deliver enough energy to heat a small volume of grass to this temperature, overcoming heat loss from conduction, convection, and radiation. So that STATED, what are the “Key Variables?”
“Mass of Grass” of Course.. I assumed here an enemy target area of 1 cm² (0.01 m²) with a mass of ~0.1 grams (dry grass density being ~0.1 g/cm³). “Specific Heat Capacity?” Dry grass (cellulose) has ~1.3 J/g°C. And that brings us to “Temperature Rise (ΔT) From ambient (~25°C) to ignition (~300°C): ΔT = 275°C.. Easy peasy let’s get Space to Earth target igniting busy!
And now I will reveal to you my “Energy Calculation” but don’t show it to any government cause they might want to build a weapon like this [Q = m \cdot C \cdot \Delta T = 0.1 \, \{g} \cdot 1.3 \, \{J/g°C} \cdot 275 \, \{°C} = 35.75 \, {J}] so THIS is the minimum theoretical energy required, ignoring heat loss of course but in reality 10–100× more energy may be needed due to inefficiencies (e.g., airflow cooling the target and yes I thought of everything as usual). So WHAT Would Be MY Practical Estimate? ~350–3,500 J (0.35–3.5 kJ) per ignition.
WHAT Would BE My Laser Specifications? Well, to ignite grass, the laser must deliver energy rapidly enough to overcome heat dissipation so here are my “Critical Parameters;”
1. Wavelength?
- Optimal: 808 nm (near-infrared by the way) or 10.6 µm (CO₂ laser).
- Quick sidenote warranted and that is the fact that grass absorbs infrared light well while visible wavelengths (e.g., 532 nm) may reflect.
2. Power? (Continuous Wave or Pulsed) with Continuous Wave (CW) sustained power to maintain temperature.
- What ABOUT Pulsed? High peak power in short bursts (e.g., nanoseconds).
3. TARGET Spot Size IN Hawaii? Focused to 1–10 mm² for maximum energy density.
4. What About Atmospheric Loss?
- Absorption/scattering by air, humidity, or dust reduces efficiency (~10–50% loss over 1 km).
My Example Design;
| Parameter | Value |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
| Wavelength | 808 nm (near-infrared) |
| Power | 500 W (CW) or 10 kW pulsed|
| Pulse Duration | 1–10 seconds (CW) or 1–10 ns (pulsed) |
| Energy per Ignition | 500–5,000 J |
| Beam Divergence | < 1 mrad (to maintain focus over distance) |
What Would Be Some Engineering Challenges?
Laser — Duh — so sufficient Power Source which could be portable Nuclear….
- A 500 W laser for example would require ~1,500 W of electrical input (efficiency ~30%).
- Battery or capacitor storage for portable systems is bulky (e.g., car battery-sized)so Portable Nuclear Fuel Cell of sorts would deliver best results and even a 1000 year shelf life of unit and worth a mention here is that if Americans were to build it Department of Energy regulates Nuclear if I am not mistaking so this would be a multi agency project and Americans g-fags can’t keep secrets for shit but always Kiss and Tell but China Commies know how to keep their kiths shut real good and we are such good friends I will can my next dog Shanghai!
Now back to “Thermal Management” you have to laser-focus on because lasers generate heat; active cooling (e.g., water or thermoelectric) in this case would be essential. And what about “Optics?” That’s CAKEWALK! High-quality lenses/mirrors to focus the beam and minimize divergence. And “Safety Systems?”
Fail-safes to prevent accidental firing or overheating? We don’t want to engineer an autonomous incinerator called TESLA which despite fire risks lacks fire suppression system if any kind so owner after owner gets barbecued when T-boned!
So I will reveal now real “Comparison to Existing Lasers” to show feasability so that huh know I ain’t beating a dead horsey in Texas like Elon and telling him to GET UP! I’ll start with “Industrial Cutting Lasers” so CO₂ lasers (1–10 kW) can cut metal but are stationary and require heavy cooling while “Military Lasers”
such as Americano Navy FAGS LaWS (30–100 kW) can disable drones but are large and power-hungry bastards like Donald Geezer Gump! What about “Handheld Lasers?” Consumer lasers are limited to < 5 W (Class 4) due to safety regulations I think if I am not mistaking and this may vary country by country but since our theoretical Space Laser is de facto military use there would be nos such issues unless the nation developing it is a signatory to a treaty which governs space lasers in which case shit outtuh luck for the bastards..
Now How Feasible Would THIS FREAQIN BE? Ground-Based? Possible with a 500 W–1 kW laser system (size of a small car by the way), but impractical for covert use cause all your enemies would be asking, hey; “what the fuck is that?”
“Space-Based?” Feasible once you overcome atmospheric distortion, power limitations, and the immense cost of launching lasers into orbit but as mother ships get bigger that will be a non-issue as long as a laser capable of igniting dry grass has ~350–3,500 J of energy, delivered via a 500 W–10 kW infrared or CO₂ laser system.
So, within a realm of possibility without any issues!
Now why would any nation on planet Earth possibly want a weapon grade laser targeting system in Space?
I am going to reveal to YOU how you can defeat all Russian, Chinese and American nukes if you engineer an elaborate AI powered cutting edge laser weapons system in space which covers the FOOTPRINT of all three nations I just mentioned two of which are playing Poker against the third who is a sucker so China and Russia against USA of course and I will do so with a detailed comparison of the speed at which lasers (directed-energy weapons) and conventional missile systems can engage targets on Earth. My analysis covers the physics of engagement, along with practical limitations, amd I will also to solidify my argument briefly cover real-world examples from various countries with zero fiction all reality!
To get to the very bottom of conventional weapons versus lasers comparison Inwillnstart with “Speed Definitions…” Laser speed? Travels at the speed of light (~300,000 km/s in a vacuum) and if
You want to get a glimpse in total darkens flick a light switch to get a visual grasp on what the speed of light is, wow! Now, how about Missile speed? Varies by type of course and all got a wide gamut in their arsenal Americans and Russians are leaders in this segment of warfare so subsonic, supersonic, hypersonic — confused yet? Not to worry, I’ll break the speed down mathematically for you… Modern missiles range from Mach 0.8** (~0.27 km/s) to Mach 25+ (~8.6 km/s) and I’m a hitchuh with my Direct Speed Comparison table:
| Sys-Type|Speed|Time2Hit 100 km Trgt |&2Hit 1,000 km Target|
|-----------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Laser (Speed of Light) | ~300,000 km/s | 0.00033 seconds | 0.0033 seconds |
| Hypersonic Missile (Mach 10, ~3.4 km/s) | ~3.4 km/s | ~29 seconds | ~294 seconds (4.9 minutes) |
| Ballistic Missile (Mach 20, ~6.8 km/s) | ~6.8 km/s | ~14.7 seconds | ~147 seconds (2.45 minutes) |
| Cruise Missile (Mach 0.8, ~0.27 km/s) | ~0.27 km/s | ~370 seconds (6.2 minutes) | ~3,700 seconds (61.6 minutes) |
So What Are The Key Factors Affecting Engagement Time?
I’ll start with Lasers…
Pros?
- Instantaneous hit: No travel time once fired (speed of light WOW).
- Precision? Can adjust aim dynamically.
- Cons?
- Line-of-sight required… Also limited by Earth’s curvature (~500 km max range for ground-based lasers) but an elaborate system can overcome these issues as it could be both ground and Space based which will inadvertently and or INTENTIONALLY make it extremely robust..
- Dwell time? Requires sustained focus (1–10 seconds) to deliver enough energy to destroy a target.
- Atmospheric interference Affecting My Laser Baby Weapon? Clouds, rain, or dust scatter laser energy.
What about freakin Missiles?
- Pros?
- Global reach.. Intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM’s) can strike anywhere on Earth.
- Kinetic impact? Delivers explosive payload.
- Cons?
- Travel time? Minutes to hours, depending on distance
so lasers beat this clunker weapons system with ease!
- Interceptability? Vulnerable to anti-missile systems (e.g., American THAAD, or Israeli Iron Dome).
Any Real-World Examples of weaponized “Laser Systems?”
1. Navy fag LaWS (Laser Weapon System cause they didn’t want to surrender to Iranians again in their knees..
- Power: 30–150 kW.
- Range: ~1–10 km (anti-drone, anti-small boat).
- Engagement time: 2–5 seconds of dwell time to disable a target.
2. Israel’s Iron Beam?
- Power: 100 kW.
- Range: ~7 km (air defense).
Next I Globe Hop 2Eval Missile Systems…
Hypersonic Missiles?
- Russian Avangard (Mach 20+): Glide vehicle for ICBM’s.
- Chinese DF-17: Mach 5–10 hypersonic glide vehicle.
Ballistic Missiles?
- U.S. Minuteman III (ICBM): Mach 23 (~7 km/s).
Cruise Missiles?
- Tomahawk (U.S.): Mach 0.8 (~0.27 km/s).
- BrahMos (India/Russia): Mach 3 (~1 km/s).
How Bout I Hitchuh With Hypothetical Scenario-Based Comparison?
Short-Range Engagement (10 km)?
- Laser: Hits instantly but requires ~5 seconds to burn through a drone.
- Missile?A short-range SAM (e.g., NASAMS) traveling at Mach 4 (~1.36 km/s) would take ~7.3 seconds.
Now a Long-Range Strike (1,000 km)?
- Laser? Impossible (curvature of Earth limits ground-based lasers).
- Ballistic Missile? ~147 seconds (Mach 20).
- And Hypersonic Glide Vehicle? ~147–294 seconds (Mach 10–20).
What About My Space-Based Lasers (Theoretical of course)?
- Speed? Still light-speed, but atmospheric distortion reduces effectiveness.
- Range? Limited by orbital mechanics (e.g., low Earth orbit satellites move at ~7.8 km/s).
So What Would Be Strategic Implications?
Lemme Outline ‘Em Below…
| Aspect | Lasers | Missiles |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Speed Advantage | Instantaneous hit
| Slow relative to lasers |
| Countermeasures | Hard to evade | Decoys, jamming, anti-missile systems |
| Cost per Shot | ~$1–10 (electricity) | $1M–$20M (e.g., Patriot missile) |
| Defensive Use | Ideal for intercepting missiles/drones | Offensive or defensive |
Any Limitations? (You want to know your weapons weaknesses to mitigate issues when engineering which is what Indo with my energy weapons and lasers and any robots I weaponize and drop as sleeper agents for burglars at one of the properties I acquired for example where one of my robots will snap a human spine when powered outside of geo fenced property boundaries…
- Lasers?
- Power requirements scale exponentially with range.
- Ineffective against hardened or fast-moving targets (e.g., ICBM’s) for now but a solution can be engineered to overcome this issue ie, simultaneous Ai targeting and higher power…
- Missiles?
- Launch detection gives defenders time to react.
- Expensive and logistically complex.
Lasers cannot be matched in speed but I think for now until laser weapons technology evolves into Soace the last frontier by the way for mankind, future conflicts will be for the time being be limited to hybrid systems (e.g., lasers for defense + missiles for offense) will likely dominate I think. For now however; no technology surpasses the raw speed of light, but practical challenges keep lasers niche compared to conventional missiles.
In warfare on battlefield, striking at the speed of LIGHT gives one unprecedented advantage over any enemy force and that is why lasers are the future of warfare both in Space and in Earth…
Categories:
People and Blogs
