Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
Exclude & Revoke American Trump 2.0 Negotiating Leverage
Duration: 0:25
Views: 26
Submitted: 3 months ago
Submitted by:
Description:
In order to creating a viable peace plan for Ukraine and Russia which requires neutrality, inclusivity, and recognition of historical grievances, EXCLUDING AND REVOKING Trump 2.0 Negotiating Leverage is the best path forward because then Putin will be compelled against his will to make concessions under threat of never ending his war and actively seizing vast Russian territories and cyber attacking their nuclear facilities daily x666 so here is my own PEACE framework WHICH can be put on Putin’s desk while simultaneously targeting him in ways I explained in detail in my other post which is the. followed by my analysis of why excluding the U.S. (and particularly the Trump administration 2.0) could be argued as beneficial in all contexts, though I will abstain from using term "stupid" because it is reductive and unproductive so Instead, I will laser focus my critiques of U.S. involvement on their strategic biases, their geopolitical self-interest, and historical precedent and lastly the number one reason you NEVER want to allow Trump to negotiate with Russia on your behalf because he negotiates from a position of weakness against an adversary Putin who ONLY favorably responds to position of strength and as a matter of fact, he fears Russia’s Nukes and shit’s his pants by his own admission — what a senile old bastard this retarded fucker is!
My Proposed Ukraine-Russia Peace Plan Without ANY American Involvement;
Ukraine Goal: End hostilities, restore Ukrainian sovereignty, and establish lasting security guarantees.
My Peace Plan Phase 1: Immediate Ceasefire
- Withdrawal: Russian forces retreat to pre-2014 borders (including Crimea and Donbas).
- Peacekeepers: Deploy a UN-led multinational force (excluding NATO and CSTO members) to monitor compliance because NATO is USA and USA is NATO - and we are keeping American Trump 2.0 fuckin OUT where he belongs across Atlantic with his MAGA FAGGOTS!
My Peace Plan Phase 2: Territorial and Security Negotiations:
- Crimea: We can hold a UN-supervised referendum on Crimea’s status after 10 years of demilitarization.
- Donbas: Grant autonomy to eastern regions under Ukrainian constitutional law, with Russian language/cultural protections.
- Neutrality: Ukraine adopts a non-aligned status (no NATO membership), backed by EU/Russia security guarantees.
My Peace Plan Phase 3: Reparations and Reconciliation:
- Reparations: Russia funds reconstruction via frozen assets and energy revenue.
- War Crimes Tribunal: Now let’s hold Russian soldiers accountable for their heinous crimes through Joint Ukrainian-Russian-EU court to investigate atrocities (I modeled mine post-WWII Nuremberg).
- Cultural Exchange: Rebuild ties through education programs and media collaborations and let healing begin — if possible at all?
My Proposed Guarantors:
- Mediators: EU, Turkey, China and the UN (neutral parties some of whom with regional stakes).
- Enforcement: Sanctions relief for Russia tied to compliance; EU security assurances for Ukraine.
Now, Why All Benefit From Exclusion of the U.S. (Current 2.0 Trump Administration)?
Critiques of U.S. involvement in peace negotiations are not about intelligence but strategic biases, and and historical America-Russia negotiating actions which go way back to their Cuban Missile Crisis as they fear nukes and cowards should never be deployed to negotiate for anyone and as a matter of fact Lavrov had stupid Marco Rubio for LUNCH during their negotiations so a little boy Shrimp was dispatched to negotiate with a Grandmaster of Chess, how stupid was that!
Now Let’s Dig In to Address Geopolitical Self-Interest Concerns:
- NATO Expansion: U.S. advocacy for Ukrainian NATO (but Ukrainians need to build their nukes again and will never need lame NATO alliance — duh) membership antagonizes Russia, escalating tensions.
- Arms Sales: The U.S. profits from prolonged conflict via defense contracts (e.g., $50B+ in military aid to Ukraine) and war kids is a FUCKIN profitable BUSINESS from accounting standpoint!
- Proxy Warfare: U.S. involvement risks framing the war as a U.S.-Russia proxy battle, not a regional dispute.
Now Let’s Look at Historical Precedent:
- Iraq/Afghanistan: U.S.-led "nation-building" failures (e.g., corruption, civilian casualties) undermine credibility.
- Syria/Ukraine 2014: The Obama administration’s "Red Line" blunders and Trump’s alleged quid pro quo (withholding aid to Ukraine) signal inconsistency.
And Next Trump Administration Specifics:
- Pro-Russia Leanings: Trump’s praise for Putin, dismissal of Russian interference, and 2019 withholding of military aid to Ukraine eroded trust.
- Transactional Diplomacy: Trump’s focus on deals (e.g., Abraham Accords) often sidelined human rights and long-term stability.
Next Quickie Glance at Cultural Misalignment:
- Complex History: U.S. policymakers often oversimplify Ukraine-Russia tensions (e.g., ignoring centuries of shared culture and Soviet legacy).
- Sanctions Overreach: Broad U.S. sanctions harm global south economies (e.g., food/energy shortages), breeding resentment.
Who Should Lead Negotiations?
Effective mediators must balance regional interests and neutrality:
1. European Union: Direct stake in regional stability and energy security.
2. Turkey: NATO member with ties to both Russia and Ukraine (e.g., grain deal broker).
3. China: Economic leverage over Russia and interest in Eurasian trade routes.
4. Global South Blocs: India, Brazil, or South Africa to represent non-Western perspectives.
My exclusion of the U.S. is less about intelligence and more about minimizing great-power rivalry and maximizing neutral mediation — aside From their fear of Russian Nukes despite cowards having their own arsenal lol! A lasting peace requires addressing root causes (NATO expansion, ethnic divisions, economic inequity), not just battlefield outcomes and worth a quickie mention that while the U.S. can support reconstruction, its role as a mediator is compromised by its AmeriKKKan military-industrial interests (desire to ink deal to secure mineral rights — to Elon Musks sole benefit?) and historical baggage.
*STATELESS WARRIOR DISCLAIMER; My PEACE framework is “theoretical” but REAL-world peace requires compromises that may dissatisfy both sides and I fly fuck neither Russian nor Ukrainian sides cause no Ukrainian bastard I ever met in USA was ANYTHING but a U.S. Government cocksucker!
My Proposed Ukraine-Russia Peace Plan Without ANY American Involvement;
Ukraine Goal: End hostilities, restore Ukrainian sovereignty, and establish lasting security guarantees.
My Peace Plan Phase 1: Immediate Ceasefire
- Withdrawal: Russian forces retreat to pre-2014 borders (including Crimea and Donbas).
- Peacekeepers: Deploy a UN-led multinational force (excluding NATO and CSTO members) to monitor compliance because NATO is USA and USA is NATO - and we are keeping American Trump 2.0 fuckin OUT where he belongs across Atlantic with his MAGA FAGGOTS!
My Peace Plan Phase 2: Territorial and Security Negotiations:
- Crimea: We can hold a UN-supervised referendum on Crimea’s status after 10 years of demilitarization.
- Donbas: Grant autonomy to eastern regions under Ukrainian constitutional law, with Russian language/cultural protections.
- Neutrality: Ukraine adopts a non-aligned status (no NATO membership), backed by EU/Russia security guarantees.
My Peace Plan Phase 3: Reparations and Reconciliation:
- Reparations: Russia funds reconstruction via frozen assets and energy revenue.
- War Crimes Tribunal: Now let’s hold Russian soldiers accountable for their heinous crimes through Joint Ukrainian-Russian-EU court to investigate atrocities (I modeled mine post-WWII Nuremberg).
- Cultural Exchange: Rebuild ties through education programs and media collaborations and let healing begin — if possible at all?
My Proposed Guarantors:
- Mediators: EU, Turkey, China and the UN (neutral parties some of whom with regional stakes).
- Enforcement: Sanctions relief for Russia tied to compliance; EU security assurances for Ukraine.
Now, Why All Benefit From Exclusion of the U.S. (Current 2.0 Trump Administration)?
Critiques of U.S. involvement in peace negotiations are not about intelligence but strategic biases, and and historical America-Russia negotiating actions which go way back to their Cuban Missile Crisis as they fear nukes and cowards should never be deployed to negotiate for anyone and as a matter of fact Lavrov had stupid Marco Rubio for LUNCH during their negotiations so a little boy Shrimp was dispatched to negotiate with a Grandmaster of Chess, how stupid was that!
Now Let’s Dig In to Address Geopolitical Self-Interest Concerns:
- NATO Expansion: U.S. advocacy for Ukrainian NATO (but Ukrainians need to build their nukes again and will never need lame NATO alliance — duh) membership antagonizes Russia, escalating tensions.
- Arms Sales: The U.S. profits from prolonged conflict via defense contracts (e.g., $50B+ in military aid to Ukraine) and war kids is a FUCKIN profitable BUSINESS from accounting standpoint!
- Proxy Warfare: U.S. involvement risks framing the war as a U.S.-Russia proxy battle, not a regional dispute.
Now Let’s Look at Historical Precedent:
- Iraq/Afghanistan: U.S.-led "nation-building" failures (e.g., corruption, civilian casualties) undermine credibility.
- Syria/Ukraine 2014: The Obama administration’s "Red Line" blunders and Trump’s alleged quid pro quo (withholding aid to Ukraine) signal inconsistency.
And Next Trump Administration Specifics:
- Pro-Russia Leanings: Trump’s praise for Putin, dismissal of Russian interference, and 2019 withholding of military aid to Ukraine eroded trust.
- Transactional Diplomacy: Trump’s focus on deals (e.g., Abraham Accords) often sidelined human rights and long-term stability.
Next Quickie Glance at Cultural Misalignment:
- Complex History: U.S. policymakers often oversimplify Ukraine-Russia tensions (e.g., ignoring centuries of shared culture and Soviet legacy).
- Sanctions Overreach: Broad U.S. sanctions harm global south economies (e.g., food/energy shortages), breeding resentment.
Who Should Lead Negotiations?
Effective mediators must balance regional interests and neutrality:
1. European Union: Direct stake in regional stability and energy security.
2. Turkey: NATO member with ties to both Russia and Ukraine (e.g., grain deal broker).
3. China: Economic leverage over Russia and interest in Eurasian trade routes.
4. Global South Blocs: India, Brazil, or South Africa to represent non-Western perspectives.
My exclusion of the U.S. is less about intelligence and more about minimizing great-power rivalry and maximizing neutral mediation — aside From their fear of Russian Nukes despite cowards having their own arsenal lol! A lasting peace requires addressing root causes (NATO expansion, ethnic divisions, economic inequity), not just battlefield outcomes and worth a quickie mention that while the U.S. can support reconstruction, its role as a mediator is compromised by its AmeriKKKan military-industrial interests (desire to ink deal to secure mineral rights — to Elon Musks sole benefit?) and historical baggage.
*STATELESS WARRIOR DISCLAIMER; My PEACE framework is “theoretical” but REAL-world peace requires compromises that may dissatisfy both sides and I fly fuck neither Russian nor Ukrainian sides cause no Ukrainian bastard I ever met in USA was ANYTHING but a U.S. Government cocksucker!
Categories:
People and Blogs
