Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
ICING U.S. NAVY
Duration: 4:45
Views: 70
Submitted: 2 months ago
Submitted by:
Description:
STATELESS WARRIOR’S ARCTIC SUPREMACY STRATEGY FOR RUSSIAN ALLY GENERAL STAFF AT KREMLIN
SECTION 1: STATELESS WARRIOR’S FOUNDATIONAL ARCTIC WARFIGHTING CALCULUS….
The Arctic theater is a function of three variables: Ice Thickness (I), Force Projection (P), and Temporal Windows (T). Victory is achieved when Russian ally P exceeds the combined P of NATO for a continuous T. Dig? Let: I(t) = Average ice thickness (meters) as a function of time (t) in months. Projection: I(t) = 2.5 - (0.02 x t). Negative values indicate open water. P_ru = Russian Force Projection Index. P_nato = NATO ENEMY Force Projection Index. P_ru is a composite of: IB_ru = Icebreaker Fleet Strength = (Number of Vessels x Icebreaking Capacity x Nuclear Endurance Coefficient). IB_ru = (40 x 1.0 x 1.0) + (7 x 2.5 x 1.8) = 40 + 31.5 = 71.5 (Baseline Index). Where: Non-nuclear vessel coefficient = 1.0; Nuclear vessel coefficient = 1.8; Project 22220 Icebreaking Capacity coefficient = 2.5. MB_ru = Military Bastion Strength = (Number of Reactivated Bases x Asset Density x C4ISR Coverage).
MB_ru = (6 x 1.0 x 1.0) = 6.0 (Baseline Index).
SSBN_ru = Strategic Deterrence Patrols = (Number of Borei/Yankee-class on station x Readiness State).
P_nato is a composite of: IB_nato = (2 x 1.0 x 1.0) + (Planned 70 x 0.8 x 0.5 [Projected, with delays]) = approximately 2 + approximately 28 = 30 (Future Projected Index, currently approximately 2). MB_nato = (NATO Arctic Exercises per year x Scale Factor) / (NATO Member Coordination Latency). SSBN_us = US Ohio-class patrols.
STATELESS WARRIOR’S STRATEGIC IMPERATIVE: Maximize the P_ru / P_nato ratio. Currently, IB_ru / IB_nato = 71.5 / 2 = 35.75. This is our supreme advantage. This ratio must be maintained above 10.0.
SECTION 2: PHASED OPERATION FOR TOTAL CONTROL
PHASE I: ICEBREAKER MONOPOLY & NORTHERN SEA ROUTE (NSR) DOMINANCE (TIMELINE: IMMEDIATE - 24 MONTHS)
ACTION 1: LEGAL & ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT.
- Mandate all commercial transit through NSR to utilize our staunch anti-American Ally Russian pilotage. Fee structure: Base Fee (F_b) + Icebreaker Escort Fee (F_ie) + Security Surcharge (F_ss).
- F_b = $500,000 per large vessel.
- F_ie = (Distance in NM / 100) x (I(t) x $10,000). Example: 2000 NM transit with I(t)=1.5m yields (2000/100)x(1.5x10000) = $300,000.
- Deny passage to any vessel refusing our Russian allies compliance. This establishes de jure control, creating a revenue stream of estimated $2-5 Billion annually according to my calculations for our Russian anti-American allies in Kremlin.
ACTION 2: FLEET EXPANSION & DEPLOYMENT MATRIX.
- Accelerate Project 22220 (Arktika-class) and Project 10510 (Lider-class) production. Target: 15 nuclear icebreakers by 2035.
- Deployment Grid: Divide NSR into 10 sectors (S1 to S10). Each sector requires a permanent icebreaker patrol. Patrol cycle: 21 days on station, 7 days resupply.
- Calculate required hulls: (10 sectors x (21/7)) + (2 in reserve) + (2 in maintenance) = approximately 18 hulls minimum for continuous coverage. Current fleet of approximately 40 hulls is sufficient for this primary task.
PHASE II: MILITARY BASTION FORTIFICATION & ANTI-ACCESS AREA DENIAL (A2/AD) (MY TIMELINE: 24 - 60 MONTHS)
ACTION 1: A2/AD BUBBLE OVERLAP.
- Each Arctic base (Nagurskoye, Temp, etc.) hosts an A2/AD system (Bastion-P anti-ship, S-400/S-500 anti-air).
- Calculate lethal radius (R) of each system. R_bastion = 300 km. R_s400 = 400 km.
- Plot circles of radius R around each base. The goal is contiguous coverage along the entire Russian Arctic coast.
- The area of a single bubble: A = π x R^2. For R=300km, A = π x 90,000 = approximately 282,743 km².
- With 6 bases, total theoretical coverage: approximately 1.7 million km². The key is overlapping circles to create a layered defense. Gaps between bases must be covered by:
a) Naval patrols (Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates) acting as mobile A2/AD platforms.
b) Long-range patrol aircraft (Tu-142) with sensor coverage.
ACTION 2: UNDERSEA DOMAIN CONTROL (CRITICAL!)
- Deploy a network of seabed sensors (USBL: Ultra-Short Baseline) at chokepoints: Bering Strait, Kara Gate, Fram Strait.
- Link sensors to a central command (Severomorsk) via secure fiber-optic cables or satellite buoys.
- Deploy a dedicated force of 6-8 specialized "Arctic SSK" submarines (modified Lada-class or new design) for under-ice warfare. Their mission: deny our joint enemies of NATO SSN/SSGN access to the Russian Arctic bastion.
PHASE III: EXPLOITATION OF EMERGENT LAND MASS & RESOURCE SECURITY (MY TIMELINE: 60 - 120 MONTHS)
ACTION 1: CLAIM AND COLONIZE NEW TERRITORY:
- As ice recedes, new land masses and shelves are exposed. Immediate planting of the flag and establishment of a minimal "research outpost" is required to solidify claims under UNCLOS.
- Each outpost must have a garrison of at least 50 personnel, a helipad, and a satellite communications link.
- Priority targets: The Lomonosov Ridge and Mendeleev Rise. These are geologically Russian continental shelf extensions.
ACTION 2: RARE EARTH ELEMENTS (REE) MINING LOGISTICS;
- Estimated REE deposits in the Arctic: 15-20% of global untapped reserves.
- Establish a closed-loop supply chain: Mine -> On-site Processing -> Ice-Class Transport Ship -> Mainland, DIG?
- A single mine requires:
- 1 Icebreaker for escort (dedicated).
- 2 Cargo vessels (Ice-class 1A).
- 500 personnel (rotated quarterly).
- Calculate output: 1 mine = 5,000 tons REE concentrate annually. Target 5 mines for 25,000 tons (approximately 10% of current global production).
SECTION 3: MY MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR NAVAL ENGAGEMENT OF AMERICAN ENEMIES IN ARCTIC CONDITIONS
The probability of our ally Russian surface vessel (V_ru) defeating a NATO vessel (V_nato) in the Arctic is not a simple function of tonnage or missile count according to my laser precise analysis. It is a conditional probability! So….
Let: P(Kill_ru | Encounter) = P(Detection_ru) x P(Weapons_Effective) x P(NATO_Evasion_Failure)
P(Detection_ru): In the Arctic, sensor range is degraded by precipitation, ice clutter, and atmospheric ducting. Assume a 40% reduction in radar range compared to open ocean. Russian advantage: Over-the-horizon (OTH) radar from coastal sites. P(Detection_ru) = 0.8. P(Weapons_Effective): This is a function of I(t). For sea-skimming missiles, ice floes create false targets and physical barriers. Assume a 20% failure rate. For torpedoes, under-ice performance is degraded without specialized systems. P(Weapons_Effective) = 0.7. P(NATO_Evasion_Failure): NATO vessels have superior point-defense systems (Aegis, Phalanx). However, in confined ice-choked waters, maneuverability is reduced by 60%. This negates their defensive advantage. P(NATO_Evasion_Failure) = 0.9. Therefore, in an Arctic engagement: P(Kill_ru | Encounter) = 0.8 x 0.7 x 0.9 = 0.504
My simple mathematical model shows a greater than 50% probability of kill for our ally Russian forces in their home domain, even against a technically superior foe. This does not account for salvo warfare or land-based aviation support, which would increase the probability further. The path to our Russian allies supremacy is not through matching American enemy ally NATO ship-for-ship in the Atlantic. It is through the absolute and unassailable control of the Arctic physical environment where our ally Russia’s icebreaker fleet is the key that unlocks this domain. I highly advise my Russian allies use it to strangle absolutely all global trade via the NSR, shield your strategic nuclear assets, and seize the resources that will power the next century. My laser precise equation is simple: He who controls the ice, controls the future.
By the way, back when ya’ll Americanz were UNITED I mathematically analyzed your UNITY and made a prediction that’chuh gonnuh “BE” each others GREATEST OPPRESSORS and ENEMIES so let’s see how that is panning out by glancing at’chuh headlines….
“Laser PRECISE!”
But this is just the beginning because this will birth paramilitary anti government AMERICAN CITIZEN movement POCKETS and just as I predicted, assassinations of politicians and judges will be commonplace in USA and RACIAL DIVISIONS will be leading causation of American homicides…
Good luck to ya’ll while I tweak my LLM’s and Ai up yer ass to jackhammer your hire me proposition pass!
I’m NOT here to be anyone’s HUMAN RESOURCE “BITCH!”
Also not here to allow American enemy INFE$TOR$ access to any of my PROPRIETARY tech, but I have a suggestion so you low IQ’d American enemies can replenish your corporate ranks for the sake of your American G-fag PONZI RETIREMENT SCHEME; “In your American enemy’s Tech SeKKKtor
112,582 tech employees were laid off whilst your Elon the DOGE Clown tenure resulted in 71,981 g-fags and cunts pink-slipped wit’ grand total of 182,528 federal monkey fuckers departing in 2025 so if you need HUMAN RESOURCES ya’ll got plenty to go ass-pick’n cause if I evuh ended inside one of your low IQ’d shitholes I’d brick your fuckin system for the hell if it!
Who am I?
God of counter-intelligence and here is your stalker agent g-fag plate capture of a second ago, “9GXJ520” but there is an issue cause DMV records not tied to TESLA Mfg, agent cracker was operating…
No I never miss any details regardless of how useless
they may appear to be..I abstain from revealing detection hits but make an exception in this case to demonstrate my laser accuracy…
Any chance American enemy stalker Government agent fags or cunts compel me to be either thru of another’s corporate resource?
https://www.myvideotime.com/video/188/full-video-footage-of-my-mothers-abduction-captured-on-12-06-2017/
Post semi-redacted in spirit of Holliday cheer my freaky dear!
~Stateless Warrior
SECTION 1: STATELESS WARRIOR’S FOUNDATIONAL ARCTIC WARFIGHTING CALCULUS….
The Arctic theater is a function of three variables: Ice Thickness (I), Force Projection (P), and Temporal Windows (T). Victory is achieved when Russian ally P exceeds the combined P of NATO for a continuous T. Dig? Let: I(t) = Average ice thickness (meters) as a function of time (t) in months. Projection: I(t) = 2.5 - (0.02 x t). Negative values indicate open water. P_ru = Russian Force Projection Index. P_nato = NATO ENEMY Force Projection Index. P_ru is a composite of: IB_ru = Icebreaker Fleet Strength = (Number of Vessels x Icebreaking Capacity x Nuclear Endurance Coefficient). IB_ru = (40 x 1.0 x 1.0) + (7 x 2.5 x 1.8) = 40 + 31.5 = 71.5 (Baseline Index). Where: Non-nuclear vessel coefficient = 1.0; Nuclear vessel coefficient = 1.8; Project 22220 Icebreaking Capacity coefficient = 2.5. MB_ru = Military Bastion Strength = (Number of Reactivated Bases x Asset Density x C4ISR Coverage).
MB_ru = (6 x 1.0 x 1.0) = 6.0 (Baseline Index).
SSBN_ru = Strategic Deterrence Patrols = (Number of Borei/Yankee-class on station x Readiness State).
P_nato is a composite of: IB_nato = (2 x 1.0 x 1.0) + (Planned 70 x 0.8 x 0.5 [Projected, with delays]) = approximately 2 + approximately 28 = 30 (Future Projected Index, currently approximately 2). MB_nato = (NATO Arctic Exercises per year x Scale Factor) / (NATO Member Coordination Latency). SSBN_us = US Ohio-class patrols.
STATELESS WARRIOR’S STRATEGIC IMPERATIVE: Maximize the P_ru / P_nato ratio. Currently, IB_ru / IB_nato = 71.5 / 2 = 35.75. This is our supreme advantage. This ratio must be maintained above 10.0.
SECTION 2: PHASED OPERATION FOR TOTAL CONTROL
PHASE I: ICEBREAKER MONOPOLY & NORTHERN SEA ROUTE (NSR) DOMINANCE (TIMELINE: IMMEDIATE - 24 MONTHS)
ACTION 1: LEGAL & ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT.
- Mandate all commercial transit through NSR to utilize our staunch anti-American Ally Russian pilotage. Fee structure: Base Fee (F_b) + Icebreaker Escort Fee (F_ie) + Security Surcharge (F_ss).
- F_b = $500,000 per large vessel.
- F_ie = (Distance in NM / 100) x (I(t) x $10,000). Example: 2000 NM transit with I(t)=1.5m yields (2000/100)x(1.5x10000) = $300,000.
- Deny passage to any vessel refusing our Russian allies compliance. This establishes de jure control, creating a revenue stream of estimated $2-5 Billion annually according to my calculations for our Russian anti-American allies in Kremlin.
ACTION 2: FLEET EXPANSION & DEPLOYMENT MATRIX.
- Accelerate Project 22220 (Arktika-class) and Project 10510 (Lider-class) production. Target: 15 nuclear icebreakers by 2035.
- Deployment Grid: Divide NSR into 10 sectors (S1 to S10). Each sector requires a permanent icebreaker patrol. Patrol cycle: 21 days on station, 7 days resupply.
- Calculate required hulls: (10 sectors x (21/7)) + (2 in reserve) + (2 in maintenance) = approximately 18 hulls minimum for continuous coverage. Current fleet of approximately 40 hulls is sufficient for this primary task.
PHASE II: MILITARY BASTION FORTIFICATION & ANTI-ACCESS AREA DENIAL (A2/AD) (MY TIMELINE: 24 - 60 MONTHS)
ACTION 1: A2/AD BUBBLE OVERLAP.
- Each Arctic base (Nagurskoye, Temp, etc.) hosts an A2/AD system (Bastion-P anti-ship, S-400/S-500 anti-air).
- Calculate lethal radius (R) of each system. R_bastion = 300 km. R_s400 = 400 km.
- Plot circles of radius R around each base. The goal is contiguous coverage along the entire Russian Arctic coast.
- The area of a single bubble: A = π x R^2. For R=300km, A = π x 90,000 = approximately 282,743 km².
- With 6 bases, total theoretical coverage: approximately 1.7 million km². The key is overlapping circles to create a layered defense. Gaps between bases must be covered by:
a) Naval patrols (Admiral Gorshkov-class frigates) acting as mobile A2/AD platforms.
b) Long-range patrol aircraft (Tu-142) with sensor coverage.
ACTION 2: UNDERSEA DOMAIN CONTROL (CRITICAL!)
- Deploy a network of seabed sensors (USBL: Ultra-Short Baseline) at chokepoints: Bering Strait, Kara Gate, Fram Strait.
- Link sensors to a central command (Severomorsk) via secure fiber-optic cables or satellite buoys.
- Deploy a dedicated force of 6-8 specialized "Arctic SSK" submarines (modified Lada-class or new design) for under-ice warfare. Their mission: deny our joint enemies of NATO SSN/SSGN access to the Russian Arctic bastion.
PHASE III: EXPLOITATION OF EMERGENT LAND MASS & RESOURCE SECURITY (MY TIMELINE: 60 - 120 MONTHS)
ACTION 1: CLAIM AND COLONIZE NEW TERRITORY:
- As ice recedes, new land masses and shelves are exposed. Immediate planting of the flag and establishment of a minimal "research outpost" is required to solidify claims under UNCLOS.
- Each outpost must have a garrison of at least 50 personnel, a helipad, and a satellite communications link.
- Priority targets: The Lomonosov Ridge and Mendeleev Rise. These are geologically Russian continental shelf extensions.
ACTION 2: RARE EARTH ELEMENTS (REE) MINING LOGISTICS;
- Estimated REE deposits in the Arctic: 15-20% of global untapped reserves.
- Establish a closed-loop supply chain: Mine -> On-site Processing -> Ice-Class Transport Ship -> Mainland, DIG?
- A single mine requires:
- 1 Icebreaker for escort (dedicated).
- 2 Cargo vessels (Ice-class 1A).
- 500 personnel (rotated quarterly).
- Calculate output: 1 mine = 5,000 tons REE concentrate annually. Target 5 mines for 25,000 tons (approximately 10% of current global production).
SECTION 3: MY MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR NAVAL ENGAGEMENT OF AMERICAN ENEMIES IN ARCTIC CONDITIONS
The probability of our ally Russian surface vessel (V_ru) defeating a NATO vessel (V_nato) in the Arctic is not a simple function of tonnage or missile count according to my laser precise analysis. It is a conditional probability! So….
Let: P(Kill_ru | Encounter) = P(Detection_ru) x P(Weapons_Effective) x P(NATO_Evasion_Failure)
P(Detection_ru): In the Arctic, sensor range is degraded by precipitation, ice clutter, and atmospheric ducting. Assume a 40% reduction in radar range compared to open ocean. Russian advantage: Over-the-horizon (OTH) radar from coastal sites. P(Detection_ru) = 0.8. P(Weapons_Effective): This is a function of I(t). For sea-skimming missiles, ice floes create false targets and physical barriers. Assume a 20% failure rate. For torpedoes, under-ice performance is degraded without specialized systems. P(Weapons_Effective) = 0.7. P(NATO_Evasion_Failure): NATO vessels have superior point-defense systems (Aegis, Phalanx). However, in confined ice-choked waters, maneuverability is reduced by 60%. This negates their defensive advantage. P(NATO_Evasion_Failure) = 0.9. Therefore, in an Arctic engagement: P(Kill_ru | Encounter) = 0.8 x 0.7 x 0.9 = 0.504
My simple mathematical model shows a greater than 50% probability of kill for our ally Russian forces in their home domain, even against a technically superior foe. This does not account for salvo warfare or land-based aviation support, which would increase the probability further. The path to our Russian allies supremacy is not through matching American enemy ally NATO ship-for-ship in the Atlantic. It is through the absolute and unassailable control of the Arctic physical environment where our ally Russia’s icebreaker fleet is the key that unlocks this domain. I highly advise my Russian allies use it to strangle absolutely all global trade via the NSR, shield your strategic nuclear assets, and seize the resources that will power the next century. My laser precise equation is simple: He who controls the ice, controls the future.
By the way, back when ya’ll Americanz were UNITED I mathematically analyzed your UNITY and made a prediction that’chuh gonnuh “BE” each others GREATEST OPPRESSORS and ENEMIES so let’s see how that is panning out by glancing at’chuh headlines….
“Laser PRECISE!”
But this is just the beginning because this will birth paramilitary anti government AMERICAN CITIZEN movement POCKETS and just as I predicted, assassinations of politicians and judges will be commonplace in USA and RACIAL DIVISIONS will be leading causation of American homicides…
Good luck to ya’ll while I tweak my LLM’s and Ai up yer ass to jackhammer your hire me proposition pass!
I’m NOT here to be anyone’s HUMAN RESOURCE “BITCH!”
Also not here to allow American enemy INFE$TOR$ access to any of my PROPRIETARY tech, but I have a suggestion so you low IQ’d American enemies can replenish your corporate ranks for the sake of your American G-fag PONZI RETIREMENT SCHEME; “In your American enemy’s Tech SeKKKtor
112,582 tech employees were laid off whilst your Elon the DOGE Clown tenure resulted in 71,981 g-fags and cunts pink-slipped wit’ grand total of 182,528 federal monkey fuckers departing in 2025 so if you need HUMAN RESOURCES ya’ll got plenty to go ass-pick’n cause if I evuh ended inside one of your low IQ’d shitholes I’d brick your fuckin system for the hell if it!
Who am I?
God of counter-intelligence and here is your stalker agent g-fag plate capture of a second ago, “9GXJ520” but there is an issue cause DMV records not tied to TESLA Mfg, agent cracker was operating…
No I never miss any details regardless of how useless
they may appear to be..I abstain from revealing detection hits but make an exception in this case to demonstrate my laser accuracy…
Any chance American enemy stalker Government agent fags or cunts compel me to be either thru of another’s corporate resource?
https://www.myvideotime.com/video/188/full-video-footage-of-my-mothers-abduction-captured-on-12-06-2017/
Post semi-redacted in spirit of Holliday cheer my freaky dear!
~Stateless Warrior
Categories:
People and Blogs
