https://www.myvideotime.com/tags/petition/ Wed, 02 Sep 2026 01:40:46 CDT https://www.myvideotime.com/video/1330/ex-parte-petition-for-dummies-101/
[It will be available for California as well, but only on Sicario.social which is not available in USA] Even MyVideoTime.com is no longer available in USA, all IP’s from United States get redirected to PornHub.com! Since I don’t comment in detail on ongoing litigation, I redrafted this to be for Nevada.. 100% legit! Mine is for California so due to the fact that I don’t reveal extreme details of ongoing legal matters, I redrafted it for Nevada State, so here you go…. That way you could legally compel them to allow you to view your mothers body, because it is extremely suspicious that they would not be allowing it as it is a common practice in every country in the fuckin World.. DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ___________________ COUNTY In re the Matter of the Remains of: ___________________, Decedent. Case No.: _______________ EX PARTE PETITION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (To Compel Viewing of Decedent's Remains and Enjoin Cremation) [PETITIONER]: ___________________ [RESPONDENTS]: ___________________; ___________________ PETITION Petitioner, ___________________, respectfully petitions this Court for emergency injunctive relief in the form of a Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to NRCP 65 and NRS 33.010, and an Order to Show Cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, compelling Respondent ___________________ to permit Petitioner to view the remains of ___________________ in person and enjoining any cremation of the remains until such viewing occurs. DECLARATION OF ___________________ I, ___________________, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Nevada that the following is true and correct: I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTS 1. I am the surviving adult child of ___________________, who passed away on ____, ____, 2026. 2. The remains of ___________________ are currently in the custody of Respondent ___________________. 3. On ______ 2026, my sibling, Respondent ___________________, arranged for Respondent ___________________ to transport the remains to their facility and signed a contract authorizing cremation. 4. I am a surviving competent adult child of the decedent. Under NRS 451.650(3), the right to control the disposition of the remains of a deceased person vests in the majority of the surviving competent adult children. As there are only two surviving adult children (myself and Respondent ___________________) and I do not consent, no majority has authorized cremation. 5. I have formally and unequivocally objected to the cremation of the remains. Respondent ___________________ does not have my consent to proceed with cremation. 6. On August 6, 2026, I contacted Respondent ___________________ and spoke with their representative, ___________________, who stated that I, as a child of the decedent, am not permitted to view the remains at their facility. 7. This statement is legally false. No Nevada statute prohibits a child from viewing a deceased parent's remains, and the refusal is inconsistent with the rights granted to me under Nevada law. 8. Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 642.090 provides that a funeral director may allow the family of a deceased person to view the preparation of the remains if the funeral director determines it is appropriate. Respondent ___________________ has refused my request without any reasonable basis, despite my position as a person with a statutory right to control disposition. 9. I have demanded to view the remains in person at the facility of Respondent ___________________. As of the date of this filing, Respondent ___________________ has failed and refused to grant me that right. 10. The refusal of Respondent ___________________ to permit me to view the remains has caused me severe emotional distress, anguish, grief, anxiety, and suffering. II. IRREPARABLE HARM 1. If Respondent ___________________ proceeds with cremation before I have had the opportunity to view the remains, I will suffer irreparable harm that cannot be adequately compensated by money damages. The opportunity to view one's deceased parent for the last time is unique, sacred, and irreplaceable. Once cremation occurs, this opportunity is permanently and irrevocably lost. 2. The common law has long recognized that the next of kin possess a quasi-property right in the body of a deceased person for purposes of burial or other lawful disposition. Restatement (Second) of Torts section 868; see also Hernandez v. City of Las Vegas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142913, at *9-10 (D. Nev. 2017) (predicting that the Nevada Supreme Court would adopt a cause of action for the negligent mishandling of a corpse, recognizing the quasi-property right and the emotional harm caused by interference with that right). That quasi-property right necessarily includes the right to take a final viewing of the remains. 3. The emotional distress caused by the permanent denial of that final opportunity constitutes irreparable harm. A money judgment cannot restore the lost moment or compensate for the lifetime of grief that such a denial would inflict. III. LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS ON THE MERITS 1. I have a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of my claim that Respondent ___________________ has unlawfully deprived me of my right to view the remains of my parent. 2. NRS 451.650(3) grants me, as a surviving competent adult child, the right to control the disposition of the remains. NRS 451.660 provides that when there is more than one person in the same priority class, the right vests in the majority. Because I have objected and there is no majority in favor of cremation, the contractual authorization obtained by Respondent ___________________ is invalid and may not be used to deny my right to view the remains. 3. NAC 642.090(2) expressly permits a funeral director to allow the family of a deceased person to view the remains. While the regulation uses permissive language, the refusal to allow such viewing when demanded by a person with the statutory right of disposition, absent any legitimate health or safety justification, is arbitrary and inconsistent with the duties owed to the next of kin. 4. Nevada courts have the equitable power to protect the quasi-property rights of next of kin in a decedent's remains. The right to a final viewing is a fundamental component of the right to control disposition. The blanket refusal by Respondent ___________________ to permit me, as an adult child, to see my parent's remains has no support in any statute or regulation and is an unreasonable interference with my rights. 5. Given the clear statutory right of control and the absence of any law prohibiting a child from viewing a parent's remains, I am likely to prevail on the merits and obtain the requested injunctive relief. IV. BALANCE OF HARDSHIPS 1. The balance of hardships tips sharply in my favor. Granting the requested relief would simply require Respondent ___________________ to allow me to view the remains -- a routine, standard industry practice. Any burden on Respondent ___________________ is minimal and can be scheduled at a mutually convenient time within 24 hours. 2. Denying the requested relief would result in the permanent, irreversible loss of my only opportunity to see my parent for the last time, causing profound emotional harm that can never be undone. 3. A brief delay in cremation to permit a viewing imposes no meaningful hardship on Respondent ___________________ or Respondent ___________________. The remains are properly refrigerated, and a viewing can be conducted safely and promptly. V. PUBLIC INTEREST The public interest strongly favors protecting the rights of next of kin to view and pay final respects to their deceased loved ones. Allowing a funeral establishment to arbitrarily deny an adult child the right to view a parent's remains would undermine public confidence in the funeral industry, disregard fundamental family values, and erode the statutory protections afforded to surviving family members under NRS Chapter 451. VI. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court: A. Issue a Temporary Restraining Order pursuant to NRCP 65 and NRS 33.010: 1. Compelling Respondent ___________________ to permit Petitioner to view the remains of ___________________ in person at their facility within 24 hours of service of this order; 2. Enjoining Respondent ___________________ and Respondent ___________________ from proceeding with any cremation, burial, or other disposition of the decedent's remains until Petitioner has had the opportunity to view the remains; 3. Ordering Respondent ___________________ to preserve the decedent's remains in their current state pending further order of this Court. B. Issue an Order to Show Cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue on the same terms; C. Award Petitioner such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. VERIFICATION I, ___________________, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Nevada that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Executed on August 7, 2026, at ___________________, Nevada. ________________________________________ Petitioner, In Pro Per [YOUR Fuckin Address] [Your Phone Number] [Email Address] And this as separate document biatch! PROPOSED ORDER (Attach as separate document) DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ___________________ COUNTY In re the Matter of the Remains of: ___________________, Decedent. Case No.: _______________ TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court, having considered the Ex Parte Petition for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order filed by Petitioner ___________________, and good cause appearing therefrom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent ___________________ shall permit Petitioner ___________________ to view the remains of ___________________ in person at their facility within 24 hours of service of this order; 2. Respondent ___________________ and Respondent ___________________ are hereby ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from cremating, burying, or otherwise disposing of the remains of ___________________ until Petitioner has had the opportunity to view the remains; 3. Respondent ___________________ shall preserve the remains of ___________________ in their current refrigerated state pending further order of this Court; 4. This Temporary Restraining Order shall remain in effect until ___________________, 2026, or until further order of this Court; 5. Respondent ___________________ is ordered to show cause before this Court on ___________________, 2026, at _______ a.m./p.m., in Department _______, why a preliminary injunction should not issue on the same terms. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ___________________ ________________________________________ DISTRICT COURT JUDGE And now, pay attention BITCH! INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING Step 1: Go to the District Court clerk's office in the Nevada county where the remains are located. Step 2: Ask for the "Ex Parte" / emergency filing window and inform the clerk you are filing an Emergency Petition for a Temporary Restraining Order. Step 3: File the Petition, your Declaration, and the Proposed Order. Bring at least 3 copies -- one for the court, one for the Respondent funeral home, and one for your records. Step 4: The judge will generally review your papers the same day if you file early enough. Be prepared to wait and to briefly explain your situation if the judge has questions. Step 5: If granted, you must serve the signed Order on all Respondents immediately (by personal delivery, email, or fax as the court directs) and file a proof of service. LEGAL AUTHORITIES I CITED NRS 451.650 - Priority of right to control disposition of remains (surviving adult children) NRS 451.660 - Majority of surviving adult children exercises the right; no majority if objection NAC 642.090(2) - Funeral director may permit family to view remains NRCP 65 - Temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions NRS 33.010 - Authority for injunctive relief Restatement (Second) of Torts section 868 - Quasi-property right in decedent's remains Hernandez v. City of Las Vegas, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142913 (D. Nev. 2017) - Federal court predicting Nevada law recognizes tort for mishandling of remains and quasi-property right IMPORTANT: I adapted my draft for Nevada law for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice! I am NOT. A fuckin lawyer! American Court procedures vary by county and judicial department same as any other country in the World! You are strongly encouraged to consult with a licensed Nevada attorney before filing but my review of Nevada Statutes in regards to this legal matter is laser precise as I exercised due diligence same as I did with California Law analysis… ]]> Fri, 07 Aug 2026 16:30:05 CDT https://www.myvideotime.com/video/1330/ex-parte-petition-for-dummies-101/